Creating a comprehensive page on transgender and gender diverse history is a significant task, given the complex and often painful legacy of oppression transgender individuals have faced. This oppression stems from societal power dynamics, particularly the imposition of gender through a reductionist framework known as gender essentialism. Gender essentialism prioritizes the body and external appearance over the inner self—treating gender as something determined solely by physical traits rather than lived experience or internal truth. In this framework, there is space for a body, but not for a self. This erasure dehumanizes transgender people and upholds systems of control that invalidate one’s right to self-definition and the freedom to live in alignment with that truth.

The history of transgender lives has been systematically gatekept, leading to widespread erasure and marginalization. Much of this history remains obscured or buried in records not easily accessed through mainstream narratives. What follows is a selection of significant people, places, and developments—as well as an overview of current progress—to help illuminate these stories and honor the contributions and resilience of transgender individuals across time. For a more comprehensive historical record, see the Digital Transgender Archive: https://www.digitaltransgenderarchive.net/


Links to Transgender History:


Gender Diversity Across Cultures and History

Sumerians: The Sumerians, one of the earliest known civilizations, recognized gender diversity in their society. Ancient texts and artifacts indicate that individuals who did not conform to binary gender categories were not only present but also held important roles in their religious and social structures. In Sumerian times, priests for Inanna known as the gala were said to have been created by the god Enki to sing laments for her, one of their central roles in her temple. This recognition reflects a more fluid understanding of gender in ancient Mesopotamia. Learn more.

Two-Spirit People and the North American Berdache: The term “Two-Spirit,” coined in 1990 during the third annual inter-tribal Native American/First Nations gay/lesbian conference in Winnipeg, refers to Indigenous North Americans embodying traditional mixed gender roles. Historically, the term “berdache” was used to describe Native American individuals who fulfilled one of many mixed-gender roles in their tribes. These roles involved wearing clothing and performing tasks associated with both men and women, representing a cultural understanding of gender that differs from Western binary concepts. The term “Two-Spirit” is now preferred as it respects the cultural significance and spiritual aspects of these identities, emerging to reclaim and affirm Indigenous gender diversity and cultural practices, challenging colonial and Western gender norms imposed on Indigenous communities. Read more.

Hijra Community in South Asia: The Hijra community, recognized as a third gender in South Asia for centuries, plays unique roles in cultural and religious ceremonies. They are often invited to bless weddings and births, reflecting their respected and spiritually significant status in society. Despite facing discrimination, Hijras continue to be a vital part of South Asian cultural heritage. Read more.

Fa’afafine of Samoa: In Samoan culture, Fa’afafine are individuals who embody both male and female traits and roles. Traditionally recognized and respected, Fa’afafine often take on caregiving roles within their families and contribute to the community through various means. Their existence challenges the Western binary gender concept and highlights the cultural richness of Samoa. Read more.

Bakla of the Philippines: Bakla is a term used in Filipino culture to describe individuals assigned male at birth who adopt feminine gender expressions and roles. Historically respected in pre-colonial society, Bakla individuals often occupy significant social spaces, particularly in the beauty and entertainment industries today. They reflect the cultural acceptance of gender diversity in the Philippines. Read more.

Kathoey in Thailand: Known colloquially as “ladyboys,” Kathoey in Thailand are individuals assigned male at birth who present as female or non-binary. Highly visible in Thai culture, they often work in entertainment and fashion, and their presence challenges Western notions of gender conformity. Despite facing legal and social hurdles, Kathoey are an integral part of Thai society. Learn more.

Bissu in Bugis Culture (Indonesia): The Bugis people of Sulawesi recognize five genders, including Bissu, who embody both male and female characteristics and hold important spiritual roles. Bissu are considered intermediaries between the spiritual and physical worlds, performing rituals and preserving oral traditions. Their existence underscores the cultural richness and gender diversity of the Bugis people. Read more.

Ashtime in Maale Culture (Ethiopia): Ashtime are males in Maale culture who adopt female roles and gender expressions. Often holding significant ritualistic and spiritual roles, they are vital to the cultural and religious practices of their community. Their acceptance reflects the nuanced understanding of gender in Maale society. Learn more.

Sekrata in Madagascar: The Sekrata are individuals assigned male at birth who take on female gender roles within the Sakalava people of Madagascar. Believed to possess special spiritual powers, Sekrata are integrated into the social and spiritual fabric of their communities. Their roles highlight the cultural acceptance of gender diversity in Madagascar. Learn more.

Māhū in Hawaiian and Tahitian Cultures: Māhū are individuals in Hawaiian and Tahitian cultures who embody both male and female spirit and roles. Traditionally respected as caretakers of culture and knowledge, Māhū play a crucial role in maintaining cultural traditions and practices. Their recognition challenges Western gender binaries and emphasizes the cultural importance of gender diversity. Read more.

Ancient Judiasm: The Talmud identifies eight genders; Zachar (male), Nekevah (female), Androgynos (both male and female traits), Tumtum (indeterminate traits), Aylonit hamah (female at birth, develops male traits naturally), Aylonit adam (female at birth, develops male traits through intervention), Saris hamah (male at birth, develops female traits naturally), and Saris adam (male at birth, develops female traits through intervention). Additionally, rabbinic literature includes the concept of the first human being created as both male and female. For more details, visit My Jewish Learning.

Gender Diversity in Ancient Rome

Ancient Rome exhibited a complex understanding of gender and sexuality, with instances of gender diversity recorded in historical texts and practices. While Roman society was predominantly patriarchal and adhered to strict gender roles, there were notable exceptions and unique cultural nuances regarding gender and sexuality (https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article-abstract/105/4/1250/87940).

The 1703 engraving “Isis Changing the Sex of Iphis” by Bauer illustrates a myth from Ovid’s Metamorphoses, which explores themes of gender, transformation, and love. In the story, Iphis, assigned female at birth but raised as a boy, is transformed into a man by the goddess Isis, allowing the relationship with a woman to continue without the constraints of societal norms (https://classics.washington.edu/sites/classics/files/documents/research/kamen_2012_iphis.pdf). In ancient Rome, same-sex relationships were accepted within certain frameworks, with a focus on maintaining power dynamics, particularly male dominance. The myth of Iphis aligns with these expectations, making the love story socially acceptable by Roman standards. Today, it resonates with trans and nonbinary people, highlighting the timeless themes of gender fluidity and self-discovery.

  1. Gallae Priests:
  • The Gallae were priests of the Phrygian goddess Cybele who were noted for their ritual castrations and adoption of female clothing and behavior. These priests, often viewed as a third gender, played a significant role in Roman religious life.
  • Sources: Ancient History Encyclopedia – Cybele
  1. Same-Sex Relationships:
  • Roman society acknowledged same-sex relationships, particularly among men. While these relationships were usually framed within specific social hierarchies and power dynamics, they highlight the fluidity of sexual norms in ancient Rome.
  • Sources: Same-Sex Relationships in Ancient Rome
  1. Legal and Social Attitudes:

These examples illustrate that while ancient Rome was largely conservative and patriarchal, there were significant exceptions and contexts where gender diversity was acknowledged and even respected. This complexity reflects the broader diversity of human cultures and the ways in which different societies have navigated and understood gender and sexuality throughout history.


Gender diversity in Ancient Greece

In Aristophanes’ speech in Plato’s Symposium, humans originally existed in three forms—male, female, and androgynous (a combined form). These original humans were powerful and self-sufficient, but after they challenged the gods, Zeus split them in two. From that point forward, each half felt incomplete and spent life searching for its missing counterpart—offering a mythic explanation for different patterns of desire and attachment, including people drawn toward the same sex or a different sex depending on which original form they came from. Plato wrote the Symposium in classical Athens, most likely around 385–370 BCE (4th century BCE).

https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1600

Uprising

Pivotal Moments

Compton’s Cafeteria Riot: A Pivotal Act of Transgender Resistance

The Compton’s Cafeteria Riot erupted in August 1966 in San Francisco’s Tenderloin District, marking one of the first recorded instances of transgender resistance against police harassment in the United States—three years before Stonewall. The riot began when a transgender woman threw hot coffee at an officer attempting to arrest her, triggering a larger confrontation in which patrons overturned tables and broke windows in defiance of police brutality. At a time when cross-dressing was criminalized, the riot became a turning point in LGBTQ+ activism, leading to the formation of the National Transsexual Counseling Unit (NTCU) and inspiring future movements. In 2024, the site at 101 Taylor Street was added to the National Register of Historic Places, cementing its legacy in transgender history.
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

The Stonewall Uprising and the Erasure of Transgender History

The Stonewall Riots, which began on June 28, 1969, were a series of spontaneous demonstrations by LGBTQ+ individuals in response to a police raid at the Stonewall Inn in New York City. At the time, homosexual acts were illegal in nearly every state, and LGBTQ+ spaces faced frequent police harassment. The uprising sparked days of protests and violent clashes with law enforcement, serving as a catalyst for the modern LGBTQ+ rights movement. It led to the formation of advocacy organizations and the initiation of annual Pride marches to commemorate the resistance.

However, in February 2025, the National Park Service (NPS) removed all references to transgender and queer individuals from its website for the Stonewall National Monument. This action followed Executive Order 14168, signed by Donald Trump, which mandated the elimination of so-called “gender ideology” from federal recognition. LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have condemned this as a deliberate act of political violence, silencing the contributions of transgender activists who played a critical role in the uprising. The erasure of transgender history from a monument meant to honor LGBTQ+ resistance represents a dangerous step toward broader state-sponsored oppression.
Sources: AP News, Them, Reuters

Emperor Elagabalus (203–222 AD)

Emperor Elagabalus, also known as Heliogabalus, challenged traditional Roman norms by openly expressing a non-binary to feminine gender identity and using she/her pronouns. She served as Roman emperor from 218 to 222 AD. Notably, she arranged a marriage with a charioteer named Hierocles, publicly declaring herself Hierocles’ wife, which defied societal expectations and shocked Roman society. Elagabalus’s reign was marked by controversy and criticism for behaviors considered unconventional by Roman standards, including religious reforms centered on the Syrian sun god Elagabal. Her defiance of gender norms and open declaration of a same-sex marriage challenged Roman patriarchal traditions, making her a controversial figure in ancient history. More about Elagabalus

Eleanor Rykener (arrested in 1394, London)

Eleanor Rykener, also known as John Rykener, was a medieval sex worker in 14th-century London, whose case provides a rare glimpse into gender and sexual diversity in the Middle Ages. Arrested in 1395 for engaging in sexual relations with men and women while cross-dressed as a man, Rykener’s confession during interrogation detailed a life that defied conventional gender norms of the time. Rykener reportedly solicited clients while presenting as both male and female, highlighting a fluidity of gender expression and sexual orientation that challenges modern assumptions about medieval attitudes towards gender and sexuality. Rykener’s case is documented in legal records of the period, offering a unique historical perspective on how individuals navigated and negotiated their identities in a society governed by rigid religious and social codes. More about Eleanor Rykener

Xica Manicongo (16th century, documented in 1591)

Xica Manicongo, originally named Francisco Manicongo, was an enslaved person from the Kingdom of Kongo who was brought to colonial Brazil in the late 1500s. They are considered one of the earliest documented transgender or gender-nonconforming individuals in the Americas. In 1591, Xica was investigated by the Portuguese Inquisition in Bahia for wearing traditionally feminine clothing and engaging in same-sex relationships, defying rigid Catholic and colonial gender norms. Their story challenges the misconception that transgender identities are modern, instead highlighting pre-colonial traditions of gender fluidity that were forcibly erased. Today, Xica Manicongo is remembered as a symbol of resistance in both transgender and Afro-Brazilian history. More about Xica Manicongo

Catalina de Erauso (1592-1650)

Catalina de Erauso, known as the “Lieutenant Nun,” was a remarkable figure born in the Basque Country around 1592. Escaping from a convent at a young age, she adopted a male identity and lived as a soldier and adventurer in the Spanish colonies of South America during the 17th century. Catalina’s life was marked by daring exploits, including duels and military campaigns, where she gained fame for her courage and skill. Her story captured the imagination of contemporaries and later historians, fascinated by her unconventional life and the challenges she faced navigating gender roles in a patriarchal society. Catalina de Erauso’s memoir, “The Lieutenant Nun: Memoir of a Basque Transvestite in the New World,” written in her later years, provides a vivid account of her experiences and remains a testament to her resilience and determination to live on her own terms. More about Catalina de Erauso

Chevalier d’Éon (1728–1810)

Chevalier d’Éon was born in Tonnerre, France. She was a diplomat, spy, soldier, and Freemason who served as a member of the French embassy in Russia, working as a spy for King Louis XV. In 1777, after years of living as a man, d’Éon began living publicly as a woman, claiming she had been assigned female at birth but raised as a boy to ensure an inheritance. The French government acknowledged d’Éon’s claim and provided financial support for her transition, including a pension and funds for a new wardrobe. D’Éon continued to live as a woman until her death in 1810. Her life and gender identity were subjects of much intrigue and speculation, and after d’Éon’s death, a post-mortem examination revealed male anatomy, adding to the complexity and mystery of her life story. More about Chevalier d’Eon

Dr. James Barry (1795-1865)

Dr. James Barry’s life seems fit for a television drama: a roguish doctor aiding the sick and poor, engaging in duels, and challenging authority figures. Despite his sharp tongue, Barry was compassionate toward his patients, earning his MD from the University of Edinburgh in 1812 and later joining the British Army as a Hospital Assistant. Barry rose to the rank of Inspector General, responsible for military hospitals, and was known for improving conditions and advocating for better sanitation. It was only after his death that Barry was discovered to have been assigned female at birth, adding another layer of complexity to his remarkable life. More about Dr. James Barry

Albert Cashier (1843–1915)

Albert Cashier was born in Clogherhead, Ireland, and immigrated to the United States, where he began living as a man. Cashier enlisted in the Union Army in 1862 during the American Civil War, serving in the 95th Illinois Infantry. He fought in approximately 40 battles and was noted for bravery and dedication, with his identity as a man not questioned during his service. After the war, Cashier continued to live as a man, working in various jobs such as a farmhand, janitor, and street lamplighter, and received a veteran’s pension, living in a soldiers’ home in later years. Cashier’s assigned gender at birth was discovered when he was admitted to a hospital in 1911 for a broken leg and later to a mental institution. Despite the discovery, many of Cashier’s comrades and community members continued to support and respect him, and his story has since been recognized as a significant example of transgender history, particularly in the context of military service. More about Albert Cashier (new link)

Alan Hart, MD (1890–1962)

Alan Hart, MD, a transgender man and physician, underwent one of the earliest known gender-affirming surgeries in the United States—a hysterectomy performed in 1917. This procedure was conducted by Dr. J. Allen Gilbert at the University of Oregon Medical School, now known as Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU). Dr. Gilbert’s involvement was crucial as he supported Hart’s transition, which was groundbreaking at a time when societal views on gender and sexuality were highly conservative. This pioneering surgery marked a significant advancement in the medical treatment of transgender individuals, setting a precedent for future gender-affirming healthcare. More about Dr. Alan Hart

Lili Elbe (1882-1931)

Lili Elbe was a Danish painter and one of the first known recipients of gender confirmation surgery, making her a pioneer in the transgender community. She gained recognition as an artist before transitioning. In the 1920s, Elbe learned of the possibility of permanently transforming her body from male to female at the German Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin. Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld founded the clinic in 1919 and coined the term “transsexualism” in 1923 (although some reports indicate that Elbe was the very first sex reassignment surgery recipient, she was not). There she underwent the first of four operations in 1930. The next three surgeries were conducted in 1930 and 1931 by Dr. Kurt Warnekros at the Dresden Municipal Women’s Clinic. Her story, which highlights the challenges and courage involved in her transition, was later chronicled in the book “Man into Woman.” Elbe’s life and legacy continue to inspire and resonate, underscoring the struggles and triumphs of early transgender pioneers. More about Lili Elbe

Michael Dillon (1915-1962)

Michael Dillon was a pioneering British physician and the first trans man to undergo phalloplasty, significantly advancing medical treatment for transgender individuals. Born in 1915, Dillon’s surgical transition began in the 1940s, the first known recipient of a phalloplasty surgery performed in 13 stages and performed by Sir Harold Gillies. Dillon also authored “Self: A Study in Endocrinology and Ethics,” one of the earliest books exploring transgender identity from a personal and scientific perspective. As a medical doctor, he worked tirelessly to support and provide care for marginalized communities. Dillon’s trailblazing journey and contributions to transgender healthcare remain influential, marking him as a significant figure in the history of LGBTQ rights and medical science. More about Michael Dillon

Reed Erickson (1917–1992)

Reed Erickson was a pioneering transgender philanthropist and businessman who used his wealth to advance LGBTQ rights and transgender visibility. Born in 1917, he transitioned in the 1960s and became one of the earliest openly transgender men in the United States. Erickson founded the Erickson Educational Foundation in 1964, which funded groundbreaking research on gender identity and supported numerous LGBTQ organizations and projects. His foundation played a pivotal role in advocating for transgender rights and funding medical and psychological research that helped shape understanding and acceptance of transgender individuals. Erickson’s legacy continues to impact the LGBTQ community, reflecting his dedication to advancing equality and recognition for transgender people worldwide. More about Reed Erickson

Christine Jorgensen (1926-1989)

Born in the Bronx, New York, Christine Jorgensen felt like a girl despite being assigned male at birth. After serving in the U.S. Army, she pursued gender confirmation surgery in Sweden, undergoing a series of hormone treatments and surgeries at the Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm under the guidance of Dr. Christian Hamburger, from whom she took her name. Karolinska was one of the leading centers for gender affirmation surgery at the time. Jorgensen’s transition received widespread media attention, making her one of the first publicly known trans women in the United States. Her openness and advocacy played a significant role in advancing public understanding of transgender issues. More about Christine Jorgensen

Marsha P. Johnson (1945-1992)

Marsha P. Johnson was an influential American LGBTQ activist and drag performer, best known for her pivotal role in the Stonewall Riots of 1969, which marked a significant turning point in the LGBTQ rights movement. Born in 1945, Johnson was a prominent figure in the gay liberation movement and co-founded the Gay Liberation Front and the Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries (STAR) alongside Sylvia Rivera. More about Marsha P. Johnson

Sarah McBride: Breaking Barriers in Transgender Political Representation

Sarah McBride is a pioneering transgender activist and politician, known for her leadership in LGBTQ+ rights. In 2020, she became the first openly transgender state senator in U.S. history, representing Delaware’s 1st Senate District. Prior to her election, she served as National Press Secretary for the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and was instrumental in securing nondiscrimination protections in Delaware. McBride first gained national recognition in 2012 when, as student body president at American University, she came out in an op-ed and later became the first openly trans White House intern under the Obama administration.

Throughout her career, McBride has championed healthcare access, LGBTQ+ protections, and broader political representation. Her memoir, Tomorrow Will Be Different, details her personal and political journey, cementing her as a leading voice for transgender rights. In 2025, she made history once again as the first openly transgender person elected to the U.S. Congress, marking a major milestone in trans political visibility.
Source: AP News


Historical Context of Gender Affirming Care

These early clinics focused on gender and sexual diversity often operated under challenging societal and legal constraints. To continue their work, they sometimes had to adopt clandestine measures. Discretion and secrecy were crucial, not only to protect the individuals involved but also to ensure the continuation of their important work. This covert approach was essential in an era with limited understanding and acceptance of gender and sexual diversity.

The British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology

Though not a clinic, the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology, founded in 1913, played a crucial role in the advocacy and academic discussion surrounding sexual and gender diversity in the UK. This society was instrumental in advancing the understanding of human sexuality and challenging the legal and social barriers faced by the LGBTQ+ community. Its members, including notable figures like Havelock Ellis and Edward Carpenter, were at the forefront of advocating for legal reforms and greater acceptance of diverse sexual and gender identities. Their activities had to be carefully managed to avoid public outrage and legal troubles, often limiting their meetings and publications to private circulation to ensure safety and continuation of their work. Read more about the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology.

Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Science

Established in 1919 in Berlin, Germany, the Institute for Sexual Science was one of the pioneering facilities in the world dedicated to the study and treatment of sexual and gender diversity. Founded by Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, a prominent sexologist and advocate for the rights of homosexual and transgender individuals, the institute was groundbreaking in its comprehensive approach. It provided hormone therapy, psychological counseling, and gender confirmation surgeries, which were revolutionary at the time. The institute not only offered medical and psychological support but also functioned as a research center and a hub for advancing civil rights for the LGBTQ+ community. Its existence was a beacon for progressive treatment and acceptance until it was tragically shut down and looted by the Nazis in 1933. The iconic images of Nazis burning books depict the tragic destruction of this institute’s invaluable library, which included thousands of volumes on sexual science. Read more about the Institute for Sexual Science.

Vienna Austria 1920’s

In the interwar period—especially the 1920s—Vienna was an important center for research and public fascination with endocrine science and the “sex glands.” One of the most prominent figures was the Austrian physiologist Eugen Steinach, whose laboratory work helped establish key ideas about gonadal hormones and their effects on physiology and sexual behavior.

Steinach is especially associated with the “Steinach operation” (a vasoligation/vasectomy-based rejuvenation procedure) that became widely discussed in the 1920s and 1930s. Although later discredited as a rejuvenation cure, it drew major medical and cultural attention, and it was reportedly pursued by notable figures including Sigmund Freud.

Steinach’s work intersected with other Austrian researchers in reproduction and endocrine theory. Historian Cheryl A. Logan documents a Steinach–Paul Kammerer collaboration and places these studies within contemporary endocrine debates.

Another key Austrian physiologist, Ludwig Haberlandt, is widely cited as an early pioneer of hormonal contraception. He also appears in the Nobel Prize nomination archive as a nominator of Steinach (1927), reflecting professional linkage within Austrian physiology/endocrinology networks.

The Distinction Between Research in Vienna and Hirschfeld’s Work

While Steinach and his colleagues in Vienna focused on physiological and hormonal studies, Magnus Hirschfeld in Berlin took a more holistic approach, integrating social, psychological, and medical perspectives on gender and sexuality. Hirschfeld’s Institute for Sexual Research, founded in 1919, offered comprehensive services, including hormone therapy, gender confirmation surgeries, and extensive research on sexual health and gender identity.

Societal and Religious Influences

In Vienna, the work was often conducted discreetly due to Austria’s conservative social and religious landscape. The church’s influence emphasized traditional views on morality and sexuality, often conflicting with the principles of autonomy and consent in scientific research. In contrast, Hirschfeld’s institute operated in the more liberal Weimar Germany, advocating for sexual reform and human rights, and emphasizing personal autonomy and informed consent in medical treatments.

Autonomy and Consent in Medicine and Research

Vienna’s research faced significant barriers due to societal and religious norms that conflicted with autonomy and consent. The church’s stance on morality and sexuality hindered open discussion and treatment of gender and sexual identity issues. Conversely, Hirschfeld in Berlin championed the rights of individuals to make informed decisions about their bodies and identities, promoting a more inclusive approach to gender diversity.

Polarization and the Rise of Fascism

The polarized views between Hirschfeld’s progressive approaches in Berlin and the conservative views in Vienna and other parts of Europe created significant social tension. The liberal approach promoted inclusivity and human rights, while the conservative stance, influenced by religious doctrines, sought to maintain traditional gender and sexual norms. This polarization contributed to the rise of extremist ideologies, with Nazi rule exploiting these tensions spreading fascism, leading to the persecution of marginalized groups and the suppression of progressive sexual science, including the targeting of Hirschfeld’s institute. (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt27906298/)

Impact on Scientific Advancements

These opposing camps highlight the significant impact of societal and political climates on scientific advancements and the treatment of marginalized groups. This polarization is reminiscent of current societal divides, which will be discussed later. For more information, you can explore sources like the Scientific American and articles discussing the broader sex reform movement in Weimar Germany, such as those found on the UNC’s History Department.

The Endocrine Clinic at Johns Hopkins Hospital

In 1935, Dr. Lawson Wilkins opened the Endocrine Clinic at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, located at the Harriett Lane Home. This clinic emerged as a pioneering institution in the United States for providing hormone therapy, initially to treat intersex children. This marked a significant advancement in endocrinology during a time when societal views on gender and sexuality were highly conservative. The clinic’s efforts laid the foundation for future advancements in transgender healthcare, later providing hormone therapy to help transgender individuals align their physical bodies with their gender identities.

One notable figure associated with Johns Hopkins who played a crucial role in transgender healthcare was Dr. John Money. Although his work began in the 1950s, his influence and the clinic’s pioneering efforts in the 1930s contributed significantly to the field. In 1966, Dr. Money founded the Gender Identity Clinic at Johns Hopkins University, starting an extensive research program on the “psychohormonal treatment of paraphilias” and “sex reassignment.” He coined and developed the term “gender role,” later expanding it to “gender identity/role” (G-I/R), helping to establish protocols for treating transgender and intersex individuals.

One of the most controversial cases in Dr. Money’s career was the treatment of David Reimer. Born Bruce Reimer, David was subjected to a failed sex reassignment experiment after a botched circumcision in infancy. Dr. Money advocated for raising David as a girl, Brenda, as part of his research on gender identity. Despite initial claims of success, David Reimer later experienced severe psychological distress and rejected the female identity imposed on him, ultimately dying at age 38. This case significantly impacted the field, highlighting the complexities and ethical considerations involved in gender reassignment, particularly for intersex individuals before their gender identity is realized. It underscored the importance of respecting individual autonomy in gender identity development and challenged some of Dr. Money’s theories and practices, emphasizing the need for a more nuanced and ethically informed approach to gender identity and medical interventions.

The medical community’s approach to intersex individuals has often prioritized societal comfort over the rights of the individual. Surgeries and hormonal treatments have been carried out to “normalize” intersex bodies, usually decided by doctors and parents without the patient’s input. These practices have raised ethical concerns, as they often disregard the principles of informed consent and bodily autonomy.

Advocacy groups and intersex activists have increasingly called for a shift in medical practices, emphasizing the importance of deferring non-urgent surgeries until the individual can participate in the decision-making process. They argue for a patient-centered approach that respects the rights of intersex individuals to make informed decisions about their own bodies. This shift aligns with broader movements within sexual and gender diversity fields that prioritize autonomy and consent.

The impact of Johns Hopkins’ early efforts within endocrinology, intersex treatment, and transgender healthcare is still felt today. In more recent years, the Johns Hopkins Center for Transgender and Gender Expansive Health continues to provide comprehensive, evidence-based, and affirming care for transgender individuals. This center offers a wide range of services, including hormone therapy, gender-affirming surgeries, and mental health support, building on the legacy of the clinic’s pioneering work from the 1930s.

For more information, you can explore LGBTQ History at JHU.

Trinidad, Colorado and the Legacy of Dr. Stanley Biber

Trinidad, Colorado became a world-recognized center for gender-affirming surgery thanks to Dr. Stanley Biber, a general surgeon who began offering this care in 1969. Over the next three decades, Biber operated on thousands of patients, transforming the small mining town into what became known as the “sex-change capital of the world.” His pioneering and compassionate approach—sometimes providing surgery at reduced or no cost—made Trinidad a lifeline for many trans people who had been turned away elsewhere.

In 1979, Johns Hopkins Hospital—which had hosted one of the first academic gender-identity clinics—closed its program. The closure was driven by psychiatry chair Paul R. McHugh and justified through a controversial study by Jon K. Meyer and Donna Reter, published in the Archives of General Psychiatry, which claimed that surgery produced “no objective advantage.” This decision led many major hospitals to stop offering gender-affirming care, pushing patients toward independent surgeons like Biber.

Biber continued performing gender-affirming surgery at Mt. San Rafael Hospital until his retirement in 2003, when Dr. Marci Bowers—herself a trans woman and one of Biber’s surgical protégés—took over the program. She practiced in Trinidad until 2010, when she relocated her clinic to the San Francisco Bay Area.

Dr. Biber’s legacy remains a defining chapter in U.S. transgender healthcare history, representing how individual physicians stepped in to meet medical needs when institutional systems withdrew.

Sources and Further Reading


These doctors, through their research, advocacy, and writings conducted across Britain, Australia, and the United States, helped lay the groundwork for understanding transgender identities within evolving scientific and social perspectives. Their efforts challenged societal norms, paving the way for future advancements in transgender rights, bodily autonomy, and healthcare worldwide:

Dr. James Barry (1795-1865)

Dr. James Barry’s life significantly influenced society, particularly in challenging and redefining traditional gender roles. As a military surgeon, Barry was not only responsible for implementing important medical reforms but also for advocating improved sanitary conditions, which broadly contributed to advances in medical practice. However, the posthumous revelation of his assigned female birth ignited significant discussions and controversies surrounding gender identity, marking a pivotal moment in societal acknowledgment of gender non-conformity.

Historically, Barry’s gender identity led to a profound reevaluation of his contributions to medicine and society. Initially celebrated for his professional accomplishments, the discovery of his gender identity following his death shifted the focus, turning his life story into a central theme in discussions about gender non-conformity, particularly within professional and military contexts. This shift in discourse, reflecting the rigid societal views on gender and sexuality of his time—and long afterward—often led to his portrayal as either deceitful or as an extraordinary deviation from normative gender expectations depending on the social contexts.

In the aftermath of his death, Barry’s story was at times ignored or sensationalized, but it also gradually helped to forge a more inclusive understanding of gender, influencing both medical and social perspectives. This evolution in understanding highlighted the arbitrary and restrictive nature of traditional gender roles, indirectly prompting early gender theorists and advocates to push for greater acceptance and understanding of transgender individuals.

Despite the scarcity of detailed writings from the period immediately following his death that delve into these themes, the ongoing discussions signal that while Barry’s life did challenge societal norms, it took considerable time for these challenges to permeate broader societal and academic discussions about gender. The significant impact of Barry’s gender and life story on societal views of gender roles and identity has been more comprehensively explored in modern times, as societal views have evolved to more openly consider and respect gender diversity.

Dr. James Barry’s legacy is a testament to the profound influence that professionals can wield in shaping societal perceptions and norms. His ability to maintain a highly respected professional status and effect substantial medical and social changes, all while concealing his gender identity, underscores the unique power that professionals have in navigating and challenging societal structures. Barry’s story serves as a poignant reminder of the potential for professionals to both reinforce and challenge societal norms, significantly influencing how gender roles are perceived and constructed in professional and broader societal contexts. Read more about Dr. James Barry

Edward Carpenter (1844-1929)

Edward Carpenter was a prominent advocate for homosexual rights and gender non-conforming individuals, conducting much of his work in England. His writings on gender variance and the social construction of gender influenced broader perceptions of gender diversity, contributing to early discussions of transgender identity and expression. Carpenter’s book “The Intermediate Sex” was groundbreaking, offering one of the first positive representations of homosexuality and advocating for the acceptance of diverse gender identities. More about Edward Carpenter

Havelock Ellis (1859-1939)

Havelock Ellis’s work, particularly in “Studies in the Psychology of Sex,” was foundational in exploring a wide range of sexual behaviors and identities. Based in Britain, his recognition of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities challenged societal norms and laid the groundwork for understanding transgender experiences within a scientific framework. Ellis’s contributions extended beyond academia; his advocacy for sexual education and open discussions about sexuality helped reduce stigma and promote acceptance of gender diversity. More about Havelock Ellis

Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935)

Magnus Hirschfeld, a pioneering German physician and sexologist, founded the Scientific-Humanitarian Committee in 1897, the first gay rights organization globally. His Institute for Sexual Science, established in 1919 in Berlin, provided comprehensive services for transgender individuals until it was tragically destroyed by the Nazis in 1933, marking a significant setback for gender studies. Hirschfeld’s advocacy for legal and social recognition of transgender people was revolutionary, and his extensive research continues to influence contemporary gender studies. More about Magnus Hirschfeld

Dr. J. Allen Gilbert (1867–1948)

Dr. J. Allen Gilbert was a significant figure in the early 20th century for transgender healthcare in Oregon. As a psychiatrist at the University of Oregon Medical School, Gilbert played a pivotal role in the transition of Alan Hart, a transgender man and physician. In 1917, Hart underwent one of the earliest known gender-affirming surgeries in the U.S., a hysterectomy performed by Dr. Gilbert. Despite the prevailing conservative views on gender and sexuality, Gilbert supported Hart’s decision to live as a man, marking a groundbreaking step in transgender healthcare.

Hart’s transition and subsequent career highlighted the importance of autonomy and the need for compassionate medical care that respects individual identity. This work contrasted sharply with the more conservative and religiously influenced views prevalent in Vienna, where similar research was conducted but often faced greater social and institutional resistance.

Gilbert’s approach was influenced by the liberal attitudes of the time, which clashed with the conservative, religiously motivated views that dominated society. This polarization created a social environment that allowed extremist ideologies, including fascism, to gain traction by promising to restore traditional values and order. The rise of Nazi rule exploited these tensions, leading to the suppression of progressive sexual science and persecution of marginalized groups.

Gilbert’s work, along with the collaborative efforts of scientists like Dr. Eugen Steinach, Ludwig Haberlandt, and Paul Kammerer in Vienna, laid the groundwork for future advancements in endocrinology and transgender healthcare. These early efforts demonstrated the critical need for medical practices that prioritize patient autonomy and informed consent, pushing against the restrictive societal norms of their time.

For more information, you can explore sources like, Scientific American, GLAPN, National Park Service, and the OHSU history.

Dr. Harold Gillies (1882-1960)

Dr. Harold Gillies, a British plastic surgeon, began performing gender confirmation surgeries in the late 1940s. His pioneering work primarily focused on individuals with genital injuries sustained during World War I and World War II, laying the foundation for modern gender confirmation surgeries. Gillies’s innovative techniques in reconstructive surgery not only advanced the field of plastic surgery but also provided transgender individuals with the possibility of aligning their physical appearance with their gender identity. Dr Gillies performed the first known phalloplasty on Dr. Michael Dillon in the 1940’s. More about Dr. Gillies

Harry Benjamin (1885-1986)

Harry Benjamin, a pioneering endocrinologist, profoundly shaped transgender healthcare. He founded what is now known as WPATH, originally the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association. While his approach initially included gatekeeping, Benjamin’s work was instrumental in legitimizing transgender medical care. His book “The Transsexual Phenomenon” was one of the first comprehensive texts on transgender issues, providing both medical professionals and the public with crucial insights into transgender health and identity. More about Harry Benjamin

Norman Haire (1892-1952)

Based in Australia, Norman Haire was a leading advocate for birth control and sexual health. His involvement in the British Society for the Study of Sex Psychology (BSSSP) and broader medical discussions helped legitimize early medical approaches to transgender issues, advocating for gender affirmation within the limited understanding of the time. Haire’s progressive views and his work in reproductive health also opened up conversations about bodily autonomy and the right to self-identify. More about Norman Haire

Dr. Elmer Belt (1893-1980)

Dr. Elmer Belt, a urologist based in the United States, provided empathetic and progressive treatments to transgender individuals during an era marked by social and medical conservatism. His pioneering work in gender-affirming care contributed to advancements in understanding and treating transgender patients with dignity and respect. Belt’s advocacy for patient-centered care and his willingness to challenge prevailing medical opinions helped to create more compassionate healthcare environments for transgender individuals. More about Dr. Elmer Belt

Dr. David Oliver Cauldwell (1897–1959)

David Oliver Cauldwell was a prolific and pioneering sexologist who coined the term “transsexual” as used in its current definition. Born in Cleveland, Ohio, Cauldwell studied medicine at the Chester College of Medicine and Surgery and at Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. His career included roles as a general practitioner, Associate Medical Officer of the Department of War, and neuro-psychiatrist. Cauldwell’s work in sexology began in the 1940s, and in 1949, he introduced the term “transsexual” in his essay “Psychopathia Transexualis” to describe individuals whose sex assigned at birth was different from their gender identity. He distinguished between “biological sex” and “psychological sex,” seeing the latter as determined by social conditioning. Despite his controversial views on “sex reassignment surgery,” which he opposed, Cauldwell was an early advocate for the acceptance of homosexuality and “transvestism.” His contributions significantly influenced the understanding of gender identity and transgender issues during his time​. More about Dr David Oliver Cauldwell.

Dr. Christian Hamburger (1904-1992)

Dr. Christian Hamburger was a renowned Danish endocrinologist who played a crucial role in the development of transgender medical care. Born in Copenhagen, Denmark, Hamburger specialized in hormone therapy and endocrinology. He gained international recognition in the early 1950s when he performed the gender confirmation procedures for Christine Jorgensen, one of the first individuals to undergo such surgery. Jorgensen chose her new name in honor of Dr. Hamburger, highlighting the significant impact he had on her life and the broader field of transgender healthcare. His work not only provided medical support but also helped to destigmatize transgender identities during a time of widespread misunderstanding and prejudice. More about Dr. Christian Hamburger.

Dr. Michael Dillon (1915-1962)

Michael Dillon was a pioneering British physician and the first trans man to undergo phalloplasty, significantly advancing medical treatment for transgender individuals. Born in 1915, Dillon’s transition began in the 1940s, culminating in a series of groundbreaking surgeries performed by Sir Harold Gillies. Dillon’s self-advocacy and determination to undergo phalloplasty not only advanced surgical techniques but also brought greater visibility and legitimacy to transgender medical care. He also authored “Self: A Study in Endocrinology and Ethics,” one of the earliest books exploring transgender identity from a personal and scientific perspective, which has had a lasting impact on both the medical community and the broader understanding of transgender experiences. More about Michael Dillon

Dr. Lawson Wilkins (1894–1963)

Dr. Lawson Wilkins was a pioneering pediatric endocrinologist who significantly influenced the field of endocrinology and the understanding of gender. He founded the first pediatric endocrinology clinic at Johns Hopkins Hospital, where he made groundbreaking advancements in treating children with endocrine disorders. Wilkins’s work was crucial in managing conditions like congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH).

Wilkins recommended that children with CAH be raised as male if it seemed more beneficial, based on the idea that the “better” sex assignment depended on the child’s overall well-being, social expectations, and available medical interventions. This approach often led to gender assignment and surgical interventions before the child could consent, which we now consider genital mutilation. These surgeries aimed to “normalize” the child’s appearance according to societal standards, without considering the child’s future identity and autonomy.

The practice of early gender assignment and genital surgery without consent has had lasting implications for intersex individuals. Many who underwent such procedures experienced physical and psychological harm. This challenged the notion that these interventions were in the child’s best interest and the imposition of gender identity through surgical means has been widely criticized for disregarding the principles of informed consent and bodily autonomy.

Wilkins’s methods predated and influenced the work of Dr. John Money. Despite the intentions behind Wilkins’s work, the practice of imposing a gender identity through surgical intervention raised significant ethical concerns. These procedures were conducted at a time when societal views on gender and sexuality were rigid and conservative, often prioritizing societal comfort over individual health, and autonomy. Read More Here

Advocacy groups and intersex activists have increasingly called for a shift in medical practices, emphasizing the importance of deferring non-urgent surgeries until the individual can participate in the decision-making process. They argue for a patient-centered approach that respects the rights of intersex individuals to make informed decisions about their own bodies. This shift aligns with broader movements within sexual and gender diversity fields that prioritize autonomy and consent.

Despite the historical context and the ethical issues raised by early practices, Wilkins’s advances and mistakes helped inform understandings of gender and contributed to developing more inclusive and affirming medical practices for intersex and transgender individuals.

For more detailed information about Lawson Wilkins and his contributions, you can refer to the Johns Hopkins Medical Archives and a research article from the University of Zurich.

Dr. John Money ( 1921–2006)

Dr. John Money was a pioneering sexologist and psychologist known for his significant contributions to the study of gender identity and the treatment of transgender individuals. Born in New Zealand, Money’s work at Johns Hopkins University from the 1950s onwards was instrumental in developing modern concepts of gender identity. He introduced and popularized the terms “gender identity” and “gender role” and was a key figure in establishing protocols for gender-affirming treatments, including hormone therapy and surgery. Money’s research and clinical practices laid the groundwork for the field of gender identity studies, though some aspects of his work, particularly his handling of the controversial John/Joan case, have been subject to criticism and ethical scrutiny. His contributions have had a lasting impact on how gender identity and health are understood and treated in medical and psychological contexts, leading to more consensual and informed practices. More about John Money.


Shaping Transgender Healthcare

World Professional Association for Transgender Health

Originally founded in 1979 as the Harry Benjamin International Gender Dysphoria Association, WPATH has played a crucial role in establishing standards of care and advocating for transgender health. The organization’s recent evolution signifies a shift towards more affirming and inclusive healthcare models, moving away from the earlier gatekeeping attitudes that once dominated trans healthcare.

Notable Presidents of WPATH:

  1. Dr. Richard Green: Founding president and psychiatrist.
  2. Dr. Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis: Contributed significantly to understanding transgender youth.
  3. Dr. Walter Bockting: Advocated for depathologizing transgender identities.
  4. Dr. Jamison Green: A transgender activist who focused on social justice and inclusivity.
  5. Dr. Vin Tangpricha: Promoted transgender healthcare access and education.
  6. Marci Bowers: A transgender surgeon and advocate, Dr. Marci Bowers has significantly advanced the field of gender-affirming surgery, transforming the landscape of transgender healthcare.”
    More about Marci Bowers

From Early Sexology to Modern Standards: How Evidence Built Gender-Affirming Care

In research, the p-value is often treated as a gatekeeper for whether a finding is “real” (statistically significant) and therefore “worthy” of publication, coverage, or clinical availability—but it answers only a narrow question: if there were truly no effect, how unlikely is the result we observed? (Taylor & Francis Online) Whether a study reaches “significance” depends not only on the size of benefit or harm, but also on sample size and how common the outcome is in the sample—so rare outcomes can look “non-significant” even when clinically important, while very large samples can make trivial differences look “significant.” (Taylor & Francis Online) This matters for gender-affirming care because insurance coverage and policy are routinely built on evidence review and medical-necessity frameworks (e.g., Medicare’s “reasonable and necessary” coverage analysis and insurer medical policies), which means the statistical evidence base directly shapes access. (CMS BlueShieldCA) At the same time, the field of psychology, psychiatry and medicine has moved away from trying to force transgender people to “align” with sex assigned at birth because those practices function as sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts—i.e., conversion therapy—which major professional bodies describe as biased/coercive and associated with harm. (American Psychological Association) These approaches often begin from a predetermined endpoint (discouraging transition regardless of the client’s needs) rather than supporting self-determination—raising clear ethical concerns about undue influence in a population already exposed to stigma and structural pressure. (American Psychological Association) Finally, because regret after gender-affirming surgery is typically rare (e.g., 2.8% in a postoperative cohort using a validated measure), studies may have too few regret cases to detect predictors reliably—another reason p-values must be interpreted alongside effect sizes, confidence intervals, and the proportion of the sample affected, rather than used as a single “yes/no” switch for access. (PubMed)

References
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2016). Decision memo for gender dysphoria and gender reassignment surgery (CAG-00446N).CMS

Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. Taylor & Francis Online  

American Psychological Association. (2021). Resolution on gender identity change efforts.American Psychological Association

American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. (2018). Conversion therapy (policy statement).

AACAP American Medical Association. (2025). Issue brief: Sexual orientation and gender identity change efforts (so-called “conversion therapy”).

American Medical Association American Medical Association. (2025). Issue brief: Health insurance coverage for gender-affirming care.

American Medical Association Blue Shield of California. (2025). Gender affirmation surgery (medical policy).

BlueShieldCA Hung, Y.-C., et al. (2023). Multidimensional assessment of patient-reported outcomes after gender-affirming surgeries using a validated instrument. (Reports 2.8% regret.)PubMed

Bruce, L., et al. (2023). Long-term regret and satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming mastectomy. JAMA Surgery.JAMA Network

The Politics of Fitting In; Decision Making

In medicine and ethics, informed consent, consent, and assent are distinct concepts with major implications for children, for people whose capacity is temporarily impaired, and for groups whose bodily autonomy has historically been overridden. Informed consent requires decision-making capacity, adequate and accurate information about risks, benefits, and alternatives, comprehension of that information, and a voluntary decision free from coercion. Consent, more broadly, refers to voluntary permission for an intervention, but it may be less robust than informed consent when full disclosure or capacity are limited or unclear. Assent refers to a person’s affirmative agreement or expressed willingness to proceed when they cannot legally give informed consent (most commonly because they are a minor), and it functions as an ethical safeguard: even when a parent or guardian provides legal authorization, clinicians should still seek the child’s developmentally appropriate understanding and willingness, and should take seriously any distress, refusal, or objection (even if the objection is going through puberty with endogenous hormones). This is precisely where intersex history is instructive: intersex infants and children were routinely subjected to “normalizing” genital surgeries through proxy decision-making, often without meaningful attention to the child’s future autonomy, and without the possibility of assent (which is developmentally impossible in infancy), and intersex advocates and human-rights organizations have documented lasting physical and psychological harms from medically unnecessary procedures performed before the person could provide consent or participate in informed consent. A key distinction here is orientation to medical authority: intersex advocacy has often centered on being protected from unnecessary clinical intervention imposed without consent, whereas transgender healthcare is typically sought by the patient as an affirming, voluntary, consent-based pathway toward embodiment and relief of dysphoria—i.e., not medicine acting on someone, but medicine being accessed by someone. KFF

Today, a parallel ethical failure is unfolding through efforts to criminalize or heavily penalize medically indicated care for transgender minors, replacing individualized clinical assessment and youth assent with categorical bans and punitive interference aimed at enforcing rigid sex/gender norms. Policy analyses and legal trackers document that many state-level restrictions have targeted clinicians and families with professional sanctions and, in some cases, criminal penalties—shifting decisions away from the patient-family-clinician relationship and into the realm of ideological enforcement. (Williams Institute) In both contexts—intersex “normalization” surgeries and political bans on transgender youth care—the shared pattern is coercive conformity: people are pressured to fit society’s expectations without regard for how they feel in their bodies, what they express, or what individualized care would support their long-term wellbeing and autonomy. The contrast becomes even clearer when you look at how the medical system handles comparable distress in a politically uncontroversial group: cisgender adolescent boys with gynecomastia are routinely evaluated for treatment, and when indicated, can receive male breast reduction surgery as a quality-of-life intervention—often discussed in clinical and professional contexts without massive political campaigns, criminalization efforts, or broad accusations of social contagion. (American Society of Plastic Surgeons) The ethical point is not that every intervention is identical, but that society’s “protection” narratives are applied selectively: when the patient’s needs align with gender norms, care is treated as ordinary; when care challenges gender norms, the state moves to control bodies and silence assent and informed consent.


The Biology of Sex: What the Research Shows

The Biology of Sex: What the Research Shows

1. Sex Is Biological — and More Complex Than a Binary

The popular understanding of biological sex as a simple male/female binary, determined entirely by chromosomes or genitalia, is incomplete. The scientific literature across neuroscience, endocrinology, and developmental biology reveals that sex involves multiple, partly independent biological systems — chromosomes, gonads, hormones, and the brain — that can diverge from one another.

Joel et al. (2015) made this case empirically by analyzing MRI data from over 1,400 human brains. Rather than finding discrete “male brains” and “female brains,” they found that most individuals have a unique mosaic of features — some more common in males, some more common in females, and many in between. Categorizing brains as simply male or female misrepresents the actual biological landscape.

2. The Brain Has Sexually Dimorphic Structures — Shaped Before Birth

While the brain mosaic finding complicates simplistic binaries, sexual dimorphism in the brain is nonetheless real. Certain brain regions differ reliably between males and females, and these differences appear to be established during prenatal development largely through the action of sex hormones.

Zhou et al. (1995) found that the volume of the central subdivision of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BSTc) — a limbic brain area involved in sexual behavior — is larger in males than in females. Critically, this difference was not attributable to adult hormone levels or sexual orientation. Kruijver et al. (2000) extended this finding by looking at neuron counts rather than volume alone, finding that male-to-female transsexual individuals had neuron numbers in the BSTc consistent with female-typical patterns, again independent of adult hormone exposure.

These findings matter because they suggest that certain brain structures reflect a developmental history of sex hormone exposure during prenatal critical periods, not just the person’s current hormonal environment.

3. Prenatal Hormones Shape Sex-Typical Traits

The role of prenatal androgens (testosterone and related hormones) in organizing brain development is one of the more robust findings in the biology of sex. Hines (2011) reviewed extensive evidence showing that prenatal androgen exposure influences a wide range of outcomes: toy and activity preferences, spatial cognition, sexual orientation, and gender identity — with effects observable across species and in clinical populations with atypical hormonal histories.

Dessens et al. (2005) provided a natural experiment supporting this. Women with congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) — a condition causing elevated prenatal androgen exposure due to a genetic enzyme deficiency — show significantly elevated rates of gender dysphoria and gender variance compared to the general female population. Since their postnatal environment is typically female, the elevated prenatal androgen exposure is the most parsimonious explanation for the increased gender variance. This strongly suggests that biological factors operating before birth contribute to gender identity.

4. Genetic Contributions: Twin Studies

If gender identity has a biological basis, we would expect to see greater concordance in identical (monozygotic) twins than in fraternal (dizygotic) twins. Heylens et al. (2012) reviewed the case literature on gender identity disorder in twins and found exactly this pattern: MZ twin pairs showed substantially higher concordance for gender identity divergence than DZ pairs, supporting a heritable component. The fact that MZ concordance is not 100%, however, indicates that biological factors beyond genetics — such as the intrauterine environment or epigenetics — also play a role.

5. Gender Identity in Children: Cognitive Evidence

The biological evidence is complemented by developmental psychology. Olson et al. (2015) studied transgender children (mean age ~5) who were socially transitioned and compared their gender cognition to cisgender controls. Transgender children showed gender associations and preferences consistent with their affirmed gender rather than their sex assigned at birth — at the same developmental stage when cisgender children first consolidate gender identity. This suggests that the gender identity of these children was not a product of social conditioning toward their birth sex, but reflected an underlying sense of identity that persisted despite having been assigned a different sex at birth.

6. Clinical Consensus: What the Biology Means for Medicine

The biological complexity of sex has practical implications for clinical care. The Endocrine Society (2017) published clinical practice guidelines affirming that gender dysphoria has a biological underpinning and that hormone therapy is safe and effective for transgender individuals, consistent with the broader evidence base. The WPATH Standards of Care Version 8 (2022) similarly reflects the consensus view that gender diversity is a natural part of human variation with biological roots, and that medical and psychological care should be individualized, evidence-based, and non-pathologizing.

Summary

Taken together, these studies paint a picture of biological sex as:

  • Multidimensional — chromosomes, gonads, prenatal hormones, brain structure, and gender identity are related but partly independent systems
  • Developmentally organized — prenatal hormone exposure during critical windows shapes brain structures and psychological traits in ways that persist into adulthood, independent of adult hormones
  • Partly heritable — twin data support a genetic contribution, though non-genetic biological factors also play a role
  • Brain-reflected — specific limbic structures show sex-typical differences that correspond to gender identity rather than chromosomal sex or sexual orientation alone
  • Variable — population-level distributions of brain features overlap substantially between males and females, meaning most individuals have mixed profiles rather than purely “male” or “female” brains

The biological picture is more nuanced than folk models of sex suggest — and that nuance has real implications for both science and medicine.

References

Zhou, J.-N., Hofman, M. A., Gooren, L. J., & Swaab, D. F. (1995). A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality. Nature, 378, 68–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/378068a0

Kruijver, F. P. et al. (2000). Male-to-female transsexuals have female neuron numbers in a limbic nucleus. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 85(5), 2034–2041. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.5.6564

Dessens, A. B., Slijper, F. M., & Drop, S. L. (2005). Gender dysphoria and gender change in chromosomal females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113654

Heylens, G. et al. (2012). Gender identity disorder in twins: A review of the case report literature. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(3), 751–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02567.x

Joel, D. et al. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(50), 15468–15473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509654112

Olson, K. R., Key, A. C., & Eaton, N. R. (2015). Gender cognition in transgender children. Psychological Science, 26(4), 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614568156

Endocrine Society. (2017). Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-01658

World Professional Association for Transgender Health. (2022). Standards of care for the health of transgender and gender diverse people, version 8. https://www.wpath.org/publications/soc


Current Challenges

Naming the Harm

We are currently witnessing a resurgence of hate and propaganda against transgender people and gender-affirming healthcare, especially alongside the global rise of extremist movements. This reflects a broader pattern of people outsourcing their conscience to authoritarians and religious zealots who offer certainty, scapegoats, and permission for cruelty. Websites such as Trans Data Library and Health Liberation Now document the individuals and groups spreading this harmful rhetoric, which often originates from fascist ideals, misogyny, and fear-mongering.

Misogyny and toxic masculinity drive a pervasive form of gender-based discrimination and hatred that’s deeply embedded in social structures and ideology. At its core is gender essentialism—the belief that gender is fixed, binary, and determined solely by physical traits—often advanced by people preoccupied with defining others’ identities while denying their sense of self. Some proponents even label themselves “radical feminists,” despite reinforcing the very systems of control they claim to oppose. A particularly insidious tactic is their appropriation of that term to obscure their real agenda: by co-opting feminist language, they mask efforts to exclude and vilify transgender women under the guise of “protecting women and children,” using inflammatory rhetoric like “mutilation.” They selectively invoke feminist principles to frame women as weak, fragile, and in need of protection, using that claim to justify excluding people from “single-sex spaces” like bathrooms and locker rooms, while aligning with broader systemic discrimination—including reliance on the gay and trans panic defense—that ultimately reflects deeply misogynistic motives. This pattern echoes what happened in 1955, when Carolyn Bryant claimed victimhood and her accusation against Emmett Till was used to legitimize an act of racial terror that ended in his murder; she later recanted key aspects of her account. (link). Today trans people are avoiding bathrooms nationwide out of fear of harassment and assault (Link). The oppression described here extends beyond individual acts of sexism into systemic patterns, including the infantilization of women and the dehumanization of gender-nonconforming and transgender people; it shows up through violence, exclusion, and institutionalized inequality that reinforces the subordination of women and transgender people across social, political, and economic spheres, and it endangers both transgender and gender-diverse people and the professionals who care for them.

References:

Trotta, D. (2016, December 8). U.S. transgender people harassed in public restrooms: Landmark survey. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/world/us-transgender-people-harassed-in-public-restrooms-landmark-survey-idUSKBN13X0BJ/ (Reuters)

PBS. (n.d.). Getting away with murder. American Experience (PBS). https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/emmett-biography-roy-carolyn-bryant-and-jw-milam/ (pbs.org)

Recognizing and calling out The spread of propaganda

Propaganda is often used by extremists to confuse the public about transgender rights and gender-affirming care through several key tactics. One form is grey propaganda, which blends elements of both black and white propaganda, making it more difficult to discern the truth. Grey propaganda can include information that is not entirely false but is presented in a misleading way, often omitting crucial context or exaggerating certain aspects to serve a specific agenda. This agenda, driven by sexism and misogyny, involves a power grab by regressive individuals who aim to impose gender on transgender people and erase transgender people’s autonomy, self determination and access to gendered spaces. These individuals use propaganda to assert their dominance and influence over societal norms, often at the expense of transgender rights and well-being (Information Disorder, 2017).

  1. Misinformation and Disinformation: Propaganda campaigns spread false or misleading information about transgender people and gender-affirming care. This includes exaggerating risks, misrepresenting medical procedures, and using unverified statistics to paint a negative picture of transgender health care. A key tactic is repetition: when the same claims are repeated across news cycles, political talking points, social media, and institutional messaging, they begin to feel familiar—and familiarity is often mistaken for truth. This is a well-established propaganda method used in authoritarian movements, where repetition is used to manufacture public “common sense,” create scapegoats, and normalize cruelty—so that policies of exclusion and violence feel justified, inevitable, or morally necessary.
  2. Fear-Mongering: By emphasizing extreme and rare cases, propagandists create a climate of fear and uncertainty. They may highlight instances of regret or negative outcomes while ignoring the overwhelming majority of positive and affirming experiences reported by transgender individuals.
  3. Emotional Appeals: Emotional manipulation is a common strategy. Propaganda often appeals to parental fears, suggesting that gender-affirming care will harm children or disrupt family dynamics, despite evidence showing the benefits of supportive environments for transgender youth.
  4. Misrepresentation of Science: Propaganda often involves cherry-picking or distorting scientific studies to support anti-transgender narratives. Legitimate research supporting gender-affirming care is downplayed or ignored, while flawed or biased studies are amplified.
  5. Language Manipulation: Using loaded and stigmatizing language, such as “mutilation” instead of “surgery” or “confused” instead of “transgender,” propagandists seek to de-legitimize transgender identities and medical care.
  6. Political and Ideological Framing: Propaganda frames transgender rights and gender-affirming care as ideological issues rather than human rights or medical concerns. This can polarize public opinion and turn medical care into a battleground for cultural or political wars.
  7. False Equivalency: Presenting both sides of the issue as equally valid, even when one side is based on misinformation or biased beliefs, creates a false sense of debate. This tactic can confuse the public and give undue weight to anti-transgender perspectives.
  8. Erasure of Transgender Voices: Propaganda often sidelines or silences the voices of transgender individuals and supportive professionals. This marginalization prevents authentic representation and understanding of transgender experiences and needs.

These tactics collectively contribute to a misinformed public, which can lead to harmful policies and social attitudes that undermine transgender rights, target gender affirming healthcare providers, and restrict access to gender-affirming care. The power grab by extremists relies heavily on manipulating public perception to sustain their control, framing their opposition to transgender rights as a moral or cultural imperative, rather than a baseless and harmful stance.

References:

Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2015). Propaganda & persuasion (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://csmeyns.github.io/propaganda-everyday/pdf/odonnell-jowett-2018-what-is-propaganda.pdf

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe. https://edoc.coe.int/en/media/7495-information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-research-and-policy-making.html

McLamore, Q., & Fuller, K. (2025). Dynamics of transphobic content and disinformation: Introduction to the special issue. Bulletin of Applied Transgender Studies, 4(1–3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.57814/ktm8-sh84

Channon, L., & Mathieson, N. (2025). Automated detection of mainstreamed transphobic content on YouTube. Bulletin of Applied Transgender Studies, 4(1–3), 41–75. https://doi.org/10.57814/49jz-0663


The Anti-Trans “Medical–Legal” Ecosystem: A Structural Description

A small cluster of tax-exempt 501(c)(3) “advocacy” organizations repeatedly appear in U.S. and international debates over transgender healthcare. The organizations are not identical in mission, branding, or constituency. However, when examined as a system, they function as a repeatable pipeline for moving a set of policy claims from organizational messaging into legislation, litigation, and media.

This is not an allegation of a unified conspiracy or shared intent. It is a description of observable division of labor: different organizations specialize in different tasks (medical-sounding branding, narrative framing, litigation support, or policy messaging), and their outputs are frequently reused across venues (e.g., testimony, briefs, op-eds, and public “guidance”).


1) Observed Communication Pathways

Across multiple campaigns, the system often resembles a relay:

  • Medical branding / “evidence” nodes: publish critiques, “guidance,” or risk narratives framed as clinical analysis.
  • Legal / policy nodes: translate those narratives into proposed statutes, legislative testimony, and court-facing “advocacy” (including amicus participation).
  • Media nodes: convert these claims into simplified story formats that circulate broadly.
  • Infrastructure: staffing, communications, and fundraising capacity sustain repeated campaigns over time.

The cumulative effect is that “advocacy” outputs can enter policymaking and judicial records as if they were independent clinical consensus, especially when briefs and hearings emphasize credentials, acronyms, or medical-sounding institutional names.


2) Authority Signaling Mechanisms

Certain organizations explicitly position themselves as medical-professional authorities or “evidence-based” evaluators. They commonly publish leadership rosters (e.g., “fellows,” “advisors,” “advisory boards”) and highlight professional credentials as credibility anchors. Those rosters and titles are then carried into policy contexts where decision-makers reasonably rely on credential cues.

This page documents these titles and structures as the organizations publicly represent them (see Part I). The analytical concern is structural: authority signaling can substitute for transparent guideline methodology or broad professional consensus, particularly when “advocacy” products are framed as medical evidence rather than policy argument.


3) Litigation and Case-Support Functions

Some organizations operate primarily as policy and litigation actors, including public-facing discussion of lawsuits, case support, and donor-backed filing activity. Sponsorship and case support can function as case-shaping infrastructure — funding filing costs, sustaining publicity, and pursuing precedent — regardless of the ultimate merits outcome or disposition.


4) Cross-Venue Reuse of Claims

Across the network, several repeatable moves are commonly observed:

  • Frame claims as “medical concern” (ethics, safeguarding, “evidence-based,” “protect kids”).
  • Move claims into legal and policy venues (testimony, model policies, briefs, amicus filings).
  • Amplify claims through repetition across outlets and cross-referencing between “advocacy” sources.
  • Apply institutional pressure through “concern” submissions, complaints, or targeted campaigns (methods vary by organization and are sometimes explicitly invited on organizational websites).

This structure does not require majority professional support to be influential. It requires:
(1) credible-sounding branding,
(2) repeatable claims,
(3) distribution capacity, and
(4) legal and policy throughput.


5) Contested “Evidence-Based” Nodes and Citation Loops

Some organizations position themselves explicitly as “evidence-based” authorities. Independent reporting shows that these nodes can become influential while also being strongly contested — praised by some actors and criticized by others. Regardless of one’s view of any individual organization, the structural issue remains: cross-citation loops can cause a small set of sources to appear like broad, independent medical consensus when cited repeatedly across filings, hearings, and media.


Resources for above Anti -Trans groups (Link)Name and Shame list

Religious right influence

Religious fragility is the defensive posture people take when their belief systems are questioned—especially when those beliefs are tied to power, privilege, or control. It mirrors white fragility and male fragility: a reactive discomfort that arises when a dominant worldview—often treated as “normal,” “moral,” or “untouchable”—is challenged. This fragility shows up when disagreement is mistaken for persecution, or when people claim they are being discriminated against simply because the harm caused by their beliefs is being named. At its core, this reaction often reflects an outsourcing of conscience: instead of individuals taking responsibility for the real-world impact of their values, moral authority is deferred to doctrine, institutions, or religious leaders, allowing harm to be reframed as righteousness. While many individuals within religious communities genuinely seek to do good, those in power have long used religion as a tool to justify subjugation—reinforcing hierarchies, restricting autonomy, and resisting social progress under the guise of moral authority. This is especially evident in the treatment of queer and trans people, as well as others who live outside rigid norms of gender, sexuality, belief, or behavior. Their existence is often framed as a threat to religious values, leading to exclusion, discrimination, and systemic violence—all defended as acts of faith, while the real harm to human dignity, safety, and self-determination is ignored or denied. Link

Martin Luther and Søren Kierkegaard both illustrate that challenging religion from within is not “anti-faith,” but often a demand for integrity. Luther’s break from the Catholic Church was rooted in confronting institutional corruption and coercion—especially the use of religious authority to control people through fear, guilt, and financial exploitation. Kierkegaard, writing centuries later, turned his critique toward the complacency of “official” Christianity itself: a social performance of belief that protects comfort and conformity while avoiding the risk, responsibility, and inward truth of genuine spiritual life. In different ways, both figures expose how fragile religious systems become when their authority is questioned—because what’s being defended is not necessarily God as a sincere object of belief, but the social power that institutions gain by claiming to speak for God.


Over-protection and Infantilization of Transgender People:

Ableism and discrimination often manifest in the over-protection and infantilization of transgender individuals, particularly in medical, social, and educational settings. This approach can be seen in several ways:

  1. Medical gatekeeping: Transgender and gender-diverse people seeking gender-affirming care are often subjected to heightened scrutiny—such as mandatory psychological “readiness” assessments, repeated evaluations, or requirements that exceed what comparable medical decisions typically demand. In practice, this can function as a paternalistic test of “fitness” rather than a support for informed consent, implicitly treating trans people as less capable of making autonomous decisions about their own bodies. Gatekeeping is also reinforced by pathologizing narratives—e.g., framing trans identity as a symptom of mental illness or as caused by sexual trauma—despite the fact that higher rates of sexual violence among trans people are well documented and are plausibly explained by disproportionate victimization tied to stigma, discrimination, and exposure to violence (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4689648/). Ultimately, these practices infantilize trans people and delay or deny medically necessary care.
  2. Limiting Autonomy: In educational settings, and now in certain states, transgender people might be overly monitored or restricted in their choices, such as bathroom access or participation in sports. This over-protection stems from an ableist view that trans individuals are inherently vulnerable and need special care, undermining their autonomy and agency. (Sports Ban, School Policy, Bathroom Ban, APA Policy)
  3. Social Paternalism: In social contexts, well-meaning allies may impose their own views on what is “best” for trans individuals, often disregarding their autonomy wishes and perspectives. This can manifest as advice or actions that limit the freedom and self-determination of trans people, treating them as if they cannot navigate their own lives without constant support. (https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15538605.2012.648583)

Vilification of Transgender People: (Content Warning)

Conversely, ableism and discrimination can also vilify transgender individuals, portraying them as threats or burdens to society. This vilification takes several forms:

  • Pathologizing Trans Identities:
    Trans individuals are often framed as mentally ill or unstable, an ableist perspective that undermines their identities and justifies exclusionary practices. This pathologization suggests that being transgender is a disorder, leading to societal and institutional rejection.
  • Stereotyping as Deceitful:
    Trans individuals, particularly transgender women, are frequently vilified through stereotypes that depict them as deceitful or dangerous. This narrative is used to justify exclusion from gender-segregated spaces and can incite fear and hostility toward trans people. (https://www.texastribune.org/2025/12/12/texas-bathroom-bill-implementation-policy-capitol/)
  • Framing as a social threat (moral panic):
    Trans people—especially trans women and trans girls—are often cast as a danger to “public safety,” “privacy,” or “fairness,” even when the claim is unsupported by evidence . This shows up in efforts to bar trans participation in public life (e.g., bathrooms and locker rooms, sports, or the military) by implying that inclusion creates risk for others (https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mace-effort-ban-transgender-women-capitols-womens-restrooms/story?id=116009034). Functionally, this rhetoric manufactures a threat narrative to activate fear and justify exclusionary policy—an approach widely analyzed as a form of moral panic, where a minoritized group is positioned as a symbolic menace to social order. Empirical research on restroom policies, for example, finds no evidence that trans-inclusive nondiscrimination protections increase safety or privacy violations; instead, trans people report higher rates of harassment and violence when accessing these spaces (https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/safety-in-restrooms-and-facilites/).
  • Manufactured “extremism” trope vs. evidence-based public safety
    The claim that “trans activists” should be treated as violent extremists is a manufactured moral-panic narrative, not an evidence-based conclusion of law enforcement. The Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project has promoted the trope it calls “Transgender Ideology–Inspired Violence and Extremism” (TIVE) and has urged the FBI to create a new domestic terrorism frame—casting transgender people or their allies as “domestic terrorists” or “nihilistic violent extremists.” GLAAD This propaganda strategy relies on familiar authoritarian dynamics: invent a threat (“gender ideology”), circulate emotionally loaded allegations (“extremism,” “terrorism”), and then use the resulting moral panic as pretext for crackdowns, rights retraction, and institutional exclusion. Outright International
    That storyline directly conflicts with what the strongest available data show about violence and trans communities. Federal hate-crime reporting tracks bias incidents motivated by gender identity, reflecting that trans and gender-diverse people are commonly targets of bias-motivated crime rather than drivers of organized violence. Federal Bureau of Investigation National victimization estimates also indicate transgender people experience substantially higher rates of violent victimization than cisgender people, underscoring that the public-safety reality is one of vulnerability, not extremist threat. Williams Institute In other words: branding trans people as “violent extremists” reverses the victim/perpetrator reality and functions as a political weapon—an authoritarian playbook move designed to justify repression under the language of “security.” GLAAD

The “Gay Panic” / “Trans Panic” Defense (includes trans people):
The so-called gay/trans “panic” defense is a trial strategy that asks jurors to blame a victim’s actual or perceived sexual orientation or gender identity for the defendant’s violent reaction, often to reduce culpability. It pathologizes LGBTQ+ identity as inherently provocative or threatening, converts prejudice into mitigation, and reinforces victim-blaming by implying LGBTQ+ people “caused” the violence against them. americanbar.org

Discrimination fuels two complementary dynamics toward trans people: paternalistic gatekeeping that treats them as incapable of self-determination, and vilification that frames them as a social threat. These narratives connect to earlier legal and cultural patterns—such as the gay/trans “panic” strategy—that have excused harm by casting LGBTQ+ identity as provocative or dangerous. Together, they reinforce a layered system of marginalization against people who fall outside rigid gender norms.


Paid influence ecosystem

A key feature of today’s anti-trans backlash is a paid influence ecosystem that elevates a small number of detransitioners and other “personal story” messengers into policy weapons—treating their narratives as representative proof that transition-related care is broadly harmful, and then routing those narratives through media, sponsored events, litigation strategy, and legislative testimony. This happens even alongside peer-reviewed outcomes research that points in a very different direction—for example, a Vanderbilt cohort using the validated VMP-G instrument reported 2.8% postoperative regret among respondents. (PubMed)

Story messengers and later repudiation 

  • Elisa Rae Shupe (Oregon-linked example of “story” cultivation and later repudiation)
    Shupe became nationally known after an Oregon judge granted legal recognition of a nonbinary sex designation in Multnomah County. (Willamette Week)
    Later reporting describes how Shupe was brought into conservative “pro-family” political spaces, including Family Policy Alliance’s Statesmen Academy—which FPA describes as providing “training, mentorship, support and coordination” for “pro-family legislators…for…Christ-centered public service.” (Family Policy Alliance)
    Shupe later repudiated this world; Uncloseted Media quotes Shupe describing a “wink-wink theatrical relationship” in which the goal was to make her detransition sound “as bad as [she] could,” and describes the “rock star treatment” and all-expenses-paid trip framing. (Uncloseted Media)
  • Ky Schevers (and collaborator Lee Leveille) — public shift / pushback after earlier involvement
    ABC News profiles Schevers as someone who previously fell into online detrans spaces that fed anti-trans politics and later organized to push back against how detransition narratives get weaponized. (ABC News)
  • Prisha Mosley — repeated testimony + reported financial assistance for travel
    The Washington Post describes Mosley as part of a small cohort of detransitioners gaining prominence in conservative campaigns, including documentaries “often sponsored by right-wing groups,” and reports that Mosley said private groups assisted her financially when she traveled to testify. (The Washington Post)

Coming out as transgender—or as any LGBTQ person—can mean moving from a life organized around performance for survival to a life organized around aliveness. In environments where authenticity feels unsafe—because of religion, family rules, bullying, discrimination, or rigid gender expectations—people often learn to monitor themselves constantly: voice, clothes, posture, interests, crushes, facial expressions, even vocal tone. They become skilled at fitting in, achieving, and seeming “fine,” sometimes living mostly in their head because it’s safer than feeling what their body and inner experience are trying to say. From the outside, this can look like confidence or success; on the inside, it can feel unreal—like playing a role, and the more praise you get for doing it “right,” the more phoney you feel. Coming out is often less a single announcement and more a gradual reorganization of a life: a slow loosening of protective performance, a decision to stop negotiating with your own reality, and a rebuilding of self that’s rooted in what actually feels true—so life stops being a script you follow and becomes something you’re finally living.

Becoming your true self usually isn’t about ripping off a mask overnight—it’s about building enough safety, over time, that you don’t need the mask to survive. When your nervous system has learned that honesty brings punishment, rejection, or chaos, it will default to management: staying “acceptable,” staying small, staying numb, constantly checking for danger. Safety changes the math. Safety looks like consistent care, predictable relationships, boundaries that actually hold, and spaces where you’re not argued out of your own reality. As safety accumulates, your body can finally relax its grip; you start noticing what you actually feel, what you actually want, what brings relief or joy, and you can take small risks—one honest sentence, one pronoun, one piece of clothing, one disclosure to a safe person. Over time, those protected experiments add up to something bigger: a life where your identity isn’t handled like a threat, but held like something real.

When someone grows up in punishing or discriminatory environments, that pressure doesn’t stay “out there.” It often gets installed inside as a punishing part—an internal enforcer that tries to keep you safe by keeping you controlled. Instead of treating basic needs as signals (rest, comfort, connection, desire, self-expression), it treats them like liabilities. It regulates through self-criticism, shame, and emotional punishment: “Don’t want that,” “Don’t show that,” “Don’t be like that,” “You’ll lose everything if you’re honest.” Early on, that harshness can function like armor—because in a threatening world, being “acceptable” can reduce harm. But over time it becomes its own injury, shrinking the person’s life and cutting them off from the very needs that make them feel real, alive, connected to their bodies, genuinely connected to others, and capable of joy. Freud called this internal punisher the superego: the internalized voice of external authority that can become especially cruel in shaming systems, enforcing “goodness” through guilt and self-attack.

That same pressure helps explain why some people detransition. Detransition is not one thing and reasons vary, but discrimination can be a major driver: when the world makes it costly to be trans—socially, economically, medically, or physically—some people conclude that the safest available option is to step back, blend in, or return to a role that reduces danger. In those circumstances, detransition can function less like a “change of truth” and more like a change in what a person can safely afford. And it’s precisely because this can be painful and real that it becomes politically useful to people who want to restrict care for everyone else.

Freud also described reaction formation: when something true inside is forbidden, a person may unconsciously perform the opposite with extra force—hyper-conformity, exaggerated “normalcy,” rigid certainty, performative piety, even hostility toward queer/trans people—to reduce anxiety and avoid internal punishment. Over time, this can become an outsourcing of conscience: the person’s internal moral compass gets replaced by an external authority that promises safety and belonging—we will tell you what’s real, and we will protect you, if you stay in line. The paid influence ecosystem exploits this pressure point. It often approaches people whose lives already come with instability—because stigma has narrowed their support, safety, and options—and then offers a powerful package: attention, certainty, community, and material support tied to public performance.

This is where payment and sponsorship can function as a behavioral lever. The ethical issue isn’t “payment exists” (that’s too simplistic). The ethical issue is how incentives can shape compliance when someone’s options have already been narrowed by stigma and structural vulnerability. The Belmont Report draws a clear line between coercion (threats) and undue influence, which can occur through offers of “excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward…to obtain compliance.” (HHS.gov) And, crucially, even when the “reward” isn’t life-changing money, it can still produce dependence if it’s structured as ongoing access: the next invitation, the next flight, the next appearance, the next check, the next surge of belonging. That dynamic is visible in mainstream reporting: the Washington Post notes detransitioners headlining conservative events and documentaries “often sponsored by right-wing groups,” and reports Mosley saying private groups helped financially when she traveled to testify. (The Washington Post)

The point here is not to deny responsibility. People are responsible for aligning with systems that target other people’s rights. The point is to illuminate why alignment can become compelling—and why it can harden into repetitive performance. In this ecosystem, complexity costs you; certainty pays. Nuance risks losing the platform; loyalty keeps you held. Personal experience gets refined into a portable script that travels cleanly to legislators, media, and courts, while ambiguity—or any affirmation that trans people’s lives remain real and deserving of care—is treated as disloyalty. That’s how a person’s pain can be recruited into a public machinery that converts private disruption into political coercion aimed at narrowing everyone else’s options, too.

This is also why affirming therapy matters. It offers an alternative to coercion and performance: a stable, internal reality-respecting relationship where identity isn’t treated as negotiable and need isn’t treated as pathology. In a steady, non-shaming space, the nervous system learns new evidence—that honesty doesn’t automatically lead to punishment, that needs aren’t moral failures, and that connection can exist without self-erasure. Over time, that kind of support softens the internal punisher (the superego when it’s organized around shame), restores internal authority, and makes it more possible for someone to build a life organized around aliveness rather than compliance—without having to hand their conscience over to whoever is offering the loudest certainty and the next paid stage.


A Timeline of Anti-LGBTQ+ Organizing and Legislation in the United States


1966 — Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic Opens

[Clinical]

Johns Hopkins Hospital opens the first Gender Identity Clinic in the United States, founded by plastic surgeon John Hoopes and psychologist John Money (STAT News, 2022). It becomes the first American academic institution to offer gender-affirming surgery. By 1979, twenty similar clinics exist across the country (STAT News, 2022).


1973 — APA Removes Homosexuality from DSM; Heritage Foundation and ALEC Founded

[Clinical / Political / Funding Network]

In December, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) Board of Trustees votes to remove homosexuality from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, second edition (DSM-II), replacing it with “Sexual Orientation Disturbance” — retained only for individuals distressed by their own orientation. 5,854 psychiatrists voted to remove it; 3,810 to retain it (Burton, 2015; Psychiatric News, 2019). Dr. Charles Socarides, who led the opposition, forces a full membership mail referendum; the membership votes 58% for removal in 1974 (Gay & Lesbian Review, 2022). Socarides will co-found the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH) in 1992 explicitly in reaction to this decision (Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) — Quacks, n.d.). His son Richard Socarides, not yet out as gay, will later work in President Clinton’s White House (Gay & Lesbian Review, 2022).

That same year, Paul Weyrich — an ordained deacon of the Melkite Greek Catholic Church who had campaigned for Alabama segregationist George Wallace — co-founds the Heritage Foundation with Edwin Feulner and Joseph Coors, seeded with an initial $250,000 from the Coors Brewing fortune and additional funding from Richard Mellon Scaife (Political Research Associates, 2018; SourceWatch, n.d.). From the same Capitol Hill office, Weyrich co-founds the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) (Monitoring Influence, 2024). Both are explicitly rooted in a Christian moral framework Weyrich describes as “a moral one” even when “packaged in non-religious language” (Public Seminar, 2024). Weyrich is particularly focused on opposing homosexual rights from the outset (University of Wyoming Archives, n.d.). The Coors family’s connection to anti-LGBTQ+ organizing does not go unnoticed. Beginning in 1973, San Francisco Teamsters strike against Coors distributors over discriminatory hiring practices; by 1974 the boycott has expanded to include LGBTQ+ consumers, Chicanx and Latinx organizations, Black activists, and Native American community leaders, united around Coors’ use of pre-employment polygraph tests that asked applicants directly about their sexual orientation (Slate, 2023; Zócalo Public Square, 2024). Harvey Milk negotiates the gay community’s participation in the boycott in exchange for Teamsters’ commitment to hiring openly gay workers — a coalition that becomes a model for labor-LGBTQ+ organizing (Good Beer Hunting, 2021). The boycott spreads from California to Chicago, Boston, and New York through the late 1980s, driven explicitly by the public politics of Joe Coors himself — his co-founding of Heritage, his backing of Reagan, and his funding of right-wing causes (Slate, 2023). It is one of the earliest sustained economic campaigns by the LGBTQ+ movement, and it is launched in the same year Heritage is founded. The simultaneity of the Heritage founding and the DSM vote is not coincidental, it is reactionary.


1975 — Paul McHugh Joins Johns Hopkins with Intent to Close the Gender Clinic

[Clinical / Political]

Paul McHugh joins Johns Hopkins as Henry Phipps Professor of Psychiatry and Psychiatrist-in-Chief, later acknowledging his intent on arrival: “It was part of my intention, when I arrived in Baltimore in 1975, to help end it” (TransAdvocate, 2018; Baltimore Magazine, 2019). He joins what Magrath (2022), writing in the Annals of Internal Medicine, describes as “a quorum of hospital leaders already intent on ending gender-affirming surgery” — the clinic is already under pressure from funding constraints, space limitations, and institutional opposition before McHugh arrives, though he later overstates his own causal role in its closure. He is a noted Catholic conservative whose views on sexuality are shaped by his faith rather than clinical evidence (Transgender Map, n.d.). He frames being transgender as a “psychiatric disorder” and calls trans women “guilt-ridden homosexual men” (Baltimore Magazine, 2019). McHugh has no published academic expertise in either gender or sexual orientation (Human Rights Campaign (HRC), n.d.) and actively avoids publishing his views in peer-reviewed journals, choosing instead op-ed outlets including the Wall Street Journal and First Things.


1976 — Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) Founded

[Clinical / Political / Funding Network]

The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC) is founded in 1976 by Ernest Lefever — whose Reagan-era nomination to the State Department fails due to his excuse-making for torture abroad — with a stated mission of “applying the Judeo-Christian moral tradition to critical issues of public policy” (Important Context, 2026). It is a right-wing think tank operating at the intersection of Catholic conservative theology and federal policy, publishing position papers, placing fellows in government, and from 2003 to 2017 publishing the non-peer-reviewed journal The New Atlantis — the outlet McHugh and Lawrence Mayer use in 2016 to publish their 143-page anti-trans “special report” (InfluenceWatch, n.d.). The New Atlantis is not a scientific journal; it describes itself as dedicated to applying religious tradition to technology and society, and explicitly prides itself on not being peer-reviewed.

EPPC’s documented funders include: the Bradley Foundation ($450,000 in 2019), DonorsTrust ($400,000 in 2019), and the John Templeton Foundation ($200,000 in 2016) (InfluenceWatch, n.d.). Leonard Leo sits on EPPC’s board of directors. Leo’s 85 Fund gives EPPC a combined $3,168,000 in 2020, 2021, and 2022 (Supreme Transparency, n.d.). EPPC is on the advisory board of Project 2025 (Important Context, 2026). In May 2025, Trump appoints EPPC president Ryan Anderson — formerly a Heritage Foundation fellow whose anti-trans book When Harry Became Sally was pulled from Amazon — to his Religious Liberty Commission. By 2025, the Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) adopts EPPC’s specific framing of gender-affirming care as “sex-rejecting procedures” — language that originates in EPPC publications and is not found in any mainstream medical literature (Important Context, 2026). The SPLC identifies EPPC as part of the anti-LGBTQ+ pseudoscience network. The funding circuit is direct: DonorsTrust funds both EPPC and the Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM) simultaneously.


1976 — Exodus International Founded

[Clinical / Religious]

Exodus International is founded in San Rafael, California in 1976 by Frank Worthen, Michael Bussee, Gary Cooper, Ron Dennis, and Greg Reid — originally as a loose network of ex-gay Christian ministries claiming that sexual orientation could be changed through prayer and faith (NBC News, 2013). It grows into the oldest and largest ex-gay Christian umbrella organization in the United States, claiming more than 260 affiliated ministries across North America and more than 150 in 17 other countries by the mid-2000s (ABC News, 2013). It becomes the primary ministry infrastructure into which NARTH routes individuals who want clinical-sounding language alongside religious intervention. Mike Johnson, who works for the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) from 2002 to 2010, collaborates with Exodus from 2006 to 2010 on the annual “Day of Truth” event in schools (CNN KFile via AOL, 2023). In 2012, president Alan Chambers renounces conversion therapy, saying it did not work and was harmful, and acknowledges his own ongoing same-sex attraction. In July 2012, this triggers a direct schism — more hardline member ministries break away and form the Restored Hope Network. In June 2013, Exodus International closes entirely. Chambers issues a formal apology: “I am sorry for the pain and hurt many of you have experienced” (CNN, 2013).


1977 — Save Our Children Founded; Focus on the Family Founded

[Political]

Singer Anita Bryant founds Save Our Children after successfully repealing a Dade County, Florida anti-discrimination ordinance protecting gay people in housing and employment. The repeal passes by more than 2-to-1, the largest response to any special election in Dade County history (PBS, n.d.). The campaign’s central tactic — framing gay rights as a threat to children, using the claim that “homosexuals cannot reproduce, so they must recruit” — becomes the template for every subsequent wave of anti-LGBTQ+ organizing (American Archive of Public Broadcasting, n.d.; NBC News, 2022).

That same year, psychologist James Dobson founds Focus on the Family in Arcadia, California as a weekly radio program (Britannica, n.d.). It moves to Colorado Springs in 1991, earns the city the nickname “the Vatican of the Religious Right,” immediately backs Colorado’s anti-gay Amendment 2, and grows into a $140 million multimedia empire (SPLC — Focus on the Family, n.d.). Dobson later co-founds ADF. He dies in August 2025 at age 89.


1978 — Briggs Initiative, California

[Political]

Following Bryant’s successful Dade County campaign, she works with California state senator John Briggs to place a ballot measure that would bar gay people from teaching in public schools and allow teachers to be fired for “advocating, encouraging, or promoting” homosexuality (EBSCO, n.d.). Rev. Lou Sheldon serves as executive director of the organizing group (Political Research Associates, 1993). The initiative fails, defeated in part by Ronald Reagan. Sheldon carries the infrastructure forward. The school-and-children frame it established becomes the preferred legislative vehicle of the network for the next five decades (SPLC — Anti-Gay Movement, n.d.).


1979 — Moral Majority Founded; Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic Closed

[Political / Clinical]

Jerry Falwell establishes the Moral Majority, a coalition of conservative evangelicals organized explicitly to influence the national Republican Party (Making Gay History, 2024). Until its dissolution in 1989, it promotes anti-gay laws, works to block the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), and legislates against abortion and pornography (SPLC — Anti-Gay Movement, n.d.). It is the direct organizational heir of the Save Our Children campaign and proof of concept for Weyrich’s strategy of fusing evangelical Christianity with partisan political infrastructure (Political Research Associates, 1993).

In the same year, McHugh petitions Psychiatric Consultation Service chair Jon Meyer and his secretary Donna Reter to produce a follow-up study of the Gender Identity Clinic’s patients. The study has a fundamental design problem from the outset: the clinic had offered surgery to only 29 patients over the entire course of its operation as part of a study, with 21 patients in a non-surgical control group — a sample size too small to support the conclusions drawn (Magrath, 2022). The study samples only patients who underwent vaginoplasty prior to 1971, meaning it does not reflect the state of the art at the time of publication — in particular, Georges Burou’s Penile Skin Flap Inversion Vaginoplasty, which had significantly advanced surgical outcomes and was the operative standard by 1979 (Magrath, 2022). Meyer and Reter (1979) measure “adjustment” by scoring job, educational, marital, and domiciliary stability — awarding points for heterosexual marriage and economic security, deducting points for gender nonconformity, homosexuality, or criminality — without accounting for the role of discrimination in suppressing societal adjustment. The study finds no patients express regret and no negative effects from surgery, but concludes surgery “confers no objective advantage in terms of social rehabilitation” (Meyer & Reter, 1979). A 1979 New York Times article reports that other doctors call it “seriously flawed in its methods and statistics and draws unwarranted conclusions” (Johns Hopkins News-Letter, 2014). A direct peer-reviewed rebuttal — Fleming, Steinman & Bocknek (1980) — documents the methodological problems in the Archives of Sexual Behavior.

Within two months of the study’s publication, McHugh uses it to assert Hopkins is “fundamentally cooperating with mental illness” and shuts the Gender Identity Clinic (Baltimore Magazine, 2019). McHugh later admits his intent was predetermined: “It was part of my intention, when I arrived in Baltimore in 1975, to help end it” (TransAdvocate, 2018). Twenty university-based clinics exist at the moment of closure; only two or three remain by the mid-1990s (STAT News, 2022). Gender-affirming surgery does not return to Johns Hopkins until 2017.


1980 — DSM-III Introduces “Transsexualism” and “Gender Identity Disorder of Childhood”

[Clinical]

The American Psychiatric Association (1980) publishes DSM-III, introducing for the first time two psychiatric diagnoses specific to gender: “transsexualism” for adolescents and adults, and “gender identity disorder of childhood” (GIDC). The APA’s (n.d.) own clinical guidance confirms it was “not until 1980 with the publication of DSM-III that the diagnosis ‘transsexualism’ first appeared.” According to Drescher (2010), writing in the Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, the decision was based on the clinical contributions of John Money, Harry Benjamin, Robert Stoller, and Richard Green. DSM-III-R (APA, 1987) further categorizes gender diagnoses into three subtypes (LGBTQIA+ Midwest, n.d.).

The placement of trans identity in a psychiatric manual — even as homosexuality has just been removed — reinforces the medical framing of trans identity as disorder. As Drescher (2010) documents, GIDC meets the accepted criteria for DSM-III inclusion, but the structural effect is the same: trans identity remains classifiable as mental illness. Socarides, who has just failed to retain homosexuality in the DSM, will co-found NARTH in 1992 and use the DSM’s continued inclusion of gender diagnoses to argue that homosexuality’s removal was politically rather than scientifically motivated (SPLC — Quacks, n.d.). McHugh uses the existence of DSM-III’s gender diagnoses to argue that trans identity is a mental disorder requiring psychiatric treatment rather than medical affirmation — a framework he deploys for the next four decades.


1980 — Traditional Values Coalition Founded

[Political]

After serving as California executive director of Bryant’s Save Our Children campaign, Lou Sheldon founds the Traditional Values Coalition (TVC) in Anaheim (SPLC — Sheldon obituary, 2020). The SPLC designates TVC an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group. TVC claims to represent 43,000 churches nationally. Sheldon and his daughter visit the George W. Bush White House 69 times combined (SPLC — Rise and Fall of TVC, 2018). In 1984, TVC organizes parents against Project 10, a Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) program supporting LGBTQ+ youth — the school-and-children frame running without interruption from 1977 (The Advocate, 2020).


1981 — Council for National Policy Founded

[Political / Funding Network]

Weyrich co-founds the Council for National Policy (CNP) with Falwell, Phyllis Schlafly, Richard Viguerie, and others — a secretive, invitation-only strategy body with no public membership lists or published meeting records (SourceWatch — CNP, n.d.). CNP consolidates Heritage, ALEC, the Moral Majority, religious leaders, and billionaire donors into a single coordinated private strategy apparatus. The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), and the Federalist Society emerge directly from this network.


1983 — Family Research Council Incorporated

[Political]

The Family Research Council (FRC) incorporates in Washington D.C. with Dobson, Harvard psychiatrist Armand Nicholi Jr., and George Rekers — who will later co-found NARTH — among its founding board (SPLC — FRC, n.d.). Under Gary Bauer — a Reagan domestic policy adviser — FRC merges with Focus on the Family in 1988, then separates in 1992 over concerns its political activity might threaten Focus’s tax-exempt status. The SPLC designates FRC an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group in 2010. In 2020, FRC reclassifies as an “association of churches,” exempting it from filing public tax returns (ProPublica, n.d.). Tony Perkins, FRC’s president since 2003, is described by House Speaker Mike Johnson as “probably the single greatest influence on my life and my professional trajectory.”


1985 — ALEC Internal Memo

[Political]

An internal ALEC memo explicitly links gay and lesbian people to pedophilia and advocates against government AIDS research funding (HRC, n.d.) — the same false conflation FRC’s Tony Perkins repeats in congressional testimony twenty-five years later, and that drives the “groomer” rhetoric of 2022–present.


1992 — NARTH Founded; McHugh Appointed to National Academy of Sciences

[Clinical / Political]

Charles Socarides, Joseph Nicolosi, and Benjamin Kaufman co-found the National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), explicitly in reaction to the APA’s 1973 declassification (SPLC — Quacks, n.d.). NARTH frames conversion therapy in clinical language — “reparative therapy,” “trauma,” “bad attachment” — to provide religious ex-gay programs with a veneer of scientific legitimacy (New Republic, 2017). George Rekers, who co-founded FRC, is also among NARTH’s founding figures. Nicolosi states: “I don’t believe anyone is really gay” (New Republic, 2017). That same year, McHugh is elected to the National Academy of Sciences’ Institute of Medicine, giving his anti-trans advocacy a continued institutional imprimatur (Recovered Memory Archive, n.d.).


1993 — “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Enacted; Organizations Opposing the Lifting of the Military Gay Ban

[Political / Military]

Clinton campaigns in 1992 on a promise to lift the military’s longstanding ban on gay service members. Upon taking office, he encounters fierce opposition from Senator Sam Nunn, the Georgia Democrat chairing the Senate Armed Services Committee, General Colin Powell (Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff), and all five service chiefs (Advocate, 2026; Britannica, n.d.). Powell testifies that “homosexual behavior is inconsistent with maintaining good order and discipline” and argues that race is a “benign characteristic” while sexual orientation is not — a distinction the Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Veterans of America directly compares to arguments used against racial integration in 1948 (Washington Blade, 2021). The New Republic documents that the arguments are “almost verbatim” those used against racial integration in 1948 (New Republic archive, 1993). Nunn stages a theatrical tour of military bases — including a visit to Norfolk where Senator Strom Thurmond lectures openly gay Lieutenant Tracy Thorne — designed to demonstrate enlisted resistance (TIME, 2018). Congress codifies the regulatory ban into federal statute. Clinton acknowledges in his July 19 announcement: “Shortly after I took office and reaffirmed my position, the foes of lifting the ban in the Congress moved to enshrine the ban in law” (American Presidency Project, 1993).

Organizations opposing the lifting of the ban: The Heritage Foundation publishes a report arguing a “total ban” is required to “retain unit cohesion and professionalism” and “prevent AIDS” (Heritage Foundation, 1993). The Center for Military Readiness (CMR) is founded in 1993 by Elaine Donnelly, a Defense Department adviser under Secretary Caspar Weinberger, specifically to oppose LGBTQ+ military integration (CMR, n.d.). FRC opposes lifting the ban throughout this period. Clinton signs the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT) policy on December 21, 1993 under Department of Defense Directive 1304.26, taking effect February 28, 1994 (EBSCO, n.d.). In the 18 years it remains in effect, 14,346 gay and lesbian service members are discharged — disproportionately people of color and women, who together account for 79% of discharges in 2008 while comprising 44% of the military (National Center for Lesbian Rights (NCLR), n.d.).


1994 — DSM-IV Consolidates to “Gender Identity Disorder”

[Clinical]

The American Psychiatric Association (1994) publishes DSM-IV, consolidating “transsexualism” and “gender identity disorder of childhood” into a single diagnosis: “gender identity disorder” (GID). The APA’s (n.d.) own clinical guidance states the change was made “in an effort to reduce stigma,” but acknowledges “controversy continued with advocates and some psychiatrists pointing to ways in which this diagnostic category pathologized identity rather than a true disorder.” Drescher (2010) documents that while prior subtypes were collapsed, the overarching framing of gender variance as disorder remained intact. The First Circuit Court of Appeals’ (2013) DSM-5 fact sheet names the structural tension: “While diagnostic terms facilitate clinical care and access to insurance coverage that supports mental health, these terms can also have a stigmatizing effect.” In parallel, the World Health Organization (WHO) (1992) publishes the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision (ICD-10), placing “gender identity disorders” in Chapter V: Mental and Behavioural Disorders. As the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH, 2010) notes, “gender identity disorder and transsexualism appear in both the DSM-IV and ICD-10, but the terms are used somewhat differently.”


1994 — Alliance Defending Freedom Founded

[Political / Legal]

On January 31, more than 30 Christian right leaders launch the Alliance Defense Fund — later renamed the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) — with Dobson, Bill Bright of Campus Crusade for Christ, D. James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Ministries, and Don Wildmon of the American Family Association (AFA) on the founding board (SPLC — ADF, n.d.). Its first fundraising solicitation warns that “hiring homosexuals in Christian schools, churches, and even as Sunday School teachers may soon become the law of the land” (Conservative Transparency, n.d.). ADF files amicus briefs supporting criminalization of sodomy in Lawrence v. Texas, defends European laws requiring sterilization of trans citizens, and becomes what one analysis calls “the most influential group working to roll back LGBTQ rights in America” (NBC News, n.d.). The SPLC designates ADF an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.


1999 — DonorsTrust Founded

[Funding Network]

DonorsTrust is established as a donor-advised fund (DAF) allowing wealthy donors to give anonymously while retaining a tax deduction. It becomes the primary financial anonymization layer for the entire network. By 2023 it holds more than $1.2 billion in assets and disburses $351 million in a single year (Washington Examiner, 2024). Recipients include Heritage Foundation, ADF, SEGM, Do No Harm, the Cato Institute, the Federalist Society, and the State Policy Network (Salon, 2023). In 2023 alone it routes $365,000 to Heritage specifically earmarked for “Going On Offense On Gender Ideology” (NOTUS, 2024). Talent Market — DonorsTrust’s own program service for placing conservative staffers inside right-wing organizations — is listed as a grant recipient in Do No Harm’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 Schedule I (primary source: ProPublica, n.d.).

Key donors to DonorsTrust: John M. Olin Foundation, Castle Rock Foundation, Searle Freedom Trust, Bradley Foundation ($650,000, 2001–2010), DeVos family ($2.5 million, 2009–2010), Robert and Rebekah Mercer ($20 million in 2020), Leonard Leo’s Marble Freedom Trust ($41 million in 2021 from Barre Seid) (EXPOSEDbyCMD, 2020).


2001–2002 — McHugh Appointed to Bush Bioethics Council and Catholic Bishops’ Review Board

[Political / Clinical]

In 2001, President Bush appoints McHugh to the President’s Council on Bioethics (Recovered Memory Archive, n.d.). In 2002, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) appoints him as a founding member of the National Review Board for the Protection of Children and Young People — where McHugh frames the Catholic clergy sex abuse scandal not as pedophilia but as “homosexual predation on American Catholic youth” (The Advocate, 2015). He files an amicus brief in support of California’s Proposition 8 on the basis that homosexuality is a “choice” (GLAAD, n.d.). He successfully lobbies for more than 30 years to keep gender-affirming surgery from becoming a Medicare benefit (Recovered Memory Archive, n.d.). He describes trans women as “caricatures of women,” “counterfeits,” and “impersonators” (HRC, n.d.) and compares gender-affirming care to “the practice of frontal lobotomy” (The Advocate, 2015). McHugh co-authors a position paper with the American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) — designated an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group by the SPLC — titled “Gender Ideology Harms Children” (GLAAD, n.d.).


2002 — American College of Pediatricians Founded

[Clinical / Political]

The American College of Pediatricians (ACPeds) is founded in 2002 when approximately 60 socially conservative members break away from the 60,000-member American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) after the AAP issues a policy statement affirming that children of gay and lesbian parents have the same developmental potential as children of heterosexual parents (SPLC — ACPeds, n.d.; GLAAD, n.d.). The SPLC designates ACPeds an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group. ACPeds opposes adoption by LGBTQ+ couples, links homosexuality to pedophilia, and endorses conversion therapy for gay youth. In 2010, ACPeds sends a letter to 14,000 school district superintendents promoting reparative therapy for gay and lesbian students and incorrectly cites National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins — who swiftly denounces the letter as “misleading and dangerous” (Psychology Today, 2017).

Its relationship to the broader network is documented by internal communications obtained by WIRED and reported by the SPLC (2024): between September and December 2014, ADF sends ACPeds a letter commissioning custom “white papers” on five topics related to LGBTQ+ children and healthcare because “ADF lacked scientific evidence to back up its claims that nondiscrimination protections put children at risk.” ADF’s letter cites a 2013 Heritage Foundation article by Ryan Anderson as the model. ACPeds members are subsequently recruited to testify in support of anti-trans healthcare bans in Georgia, Alabama, Kentucky, and Ohio. ACPeds receives large in-kind donations from ADF and Heritage, including media training and messaging guidance (HRC, 2025). In 2025, ACPeds files an amicus brief in United States v. Skrmetti arguing in favor of Tennessee’s ban on healthcare for transgender youth (GLAAD, n.d.).


2002 — United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) — McHugh Appointment; Ongoing Anti-LGBTQ+ Policy

[Political / Clinical]

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) is the assembly of Catholic bishops in the United States. Its engagement with anti-LGBTQ+ policy is sustained and structural across more than two decades. In 2002, the USCCB appoints McHugh as a founding member of its National Review Board for the Protection of Children and Young People — where McHugh frames the Catholic clergy sex abuse scandal not as pedophilia but as “homosexual predation on American Catholic youth,” serving simultaneously to deflect institutional accountability and to reinforce the false linkage between homosexuality and predatory behavior (The Advocate, 2015).

The USCCB opposes: HHS non-discrimination rules protecting LGBTQ+ patients under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (New Ways Ministry, 2022); the Equality Act; and provisions of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) that include LGBTQ+ funding, a stance maintained since March 2013 (National Catholic Reporter, n.d.). It opposes HHS proposed rules mandating non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation across more than 100 federal programs (New Ways Ministry, 2024). In November 2024, conservative USCCB leaders act swiftly to implement the transgender-negative passages of the Vatican’s Dignitas Infinita declaration (New Ways Ministry, 2024). In November 2025, the USCCB adopts new Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) banning gender-affirming care at Catholic hospitals — without consulting WPATH or any mainstream healthcare organization (New Ways Ministry, 2025). New Ways Ministry states: “The directives adopted by the USCCB will harm, not benefit transgender persons… it gives a blessing to people who seek to deny, hurt, and too often, even murder transgender people.” The USCCB’s ERDs apply to the largest nonprofit hospital system in the United States.


2003 — Lawrence v. Texas; Federal Marriage Amendment Introduced

[Political / Legal]

On June 26, 2003, the Supreme Court rules 6-3 in Lawrence v. Texas, striking down Texas’s anti-sodomy law and overturning Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) (Human Rights Watch, 2003). ADF had filed an amicus brief in support of Texas; the ruling is a direct defeat for the network. Justice Scalia’s dissent, joined by Rehnquist and Thomas, warns that the decision places at risk laws against “bigamy, same-sex marriage, adult incest, prostitution… adultery, fornication, bestiality, and obscenity” — a dissent the anti-LGBTQ+ network treats as a roadmap for the next legislative campaign.

Within months, Congresswoman Marilyn Musgrave introduces the Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) with 108 co-sponsors (Brennan Center, n.d.). Heritage, FRC, and Focus on the Family immediately mobilize in support. The Heritage Foundation publishes analysis arguing that Lawrence and Romer v. Evans (1996) have made the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) constitutionally vulnerable and that a constitutional amendment is the only reliable protection (Heritage Foundation, 2005).


2004 — State Marriage Amendment Campaign; 13 States Ban Same-Sex Marriage

[Political]

In May 2004, Massachusetts becomes the first state to legally recognize same-sex marriage through Goodridge v. Department of Public Health. Bush campaign strategist Karl Rove, working with state-level activists, orchestrates campaigns to introduce ballot initiatives in 13 states amending state constitutions to ban same-sex marriage — calculating that the issue will drive evangelical turnout for Bush’s reelection (Brennan Center, n.d.). All 13 pass on Election Day 2004, often by wide margins — 3-to-1 in Kentucky and Georgia, 6-to-1 in Mississippi (CBS News, 2004; NPR, 2004). By 2012, voters in 27 states have approved constitutional measures defining marriage as between one man and one woman (Ballotpedia, n.d.). FRC, Heritage, and ADF provide legal drafting, messaging, and model legislation throughout. The campaign uses the same children-protection framing Save Our Children established in 1977 — proponents argue the amendment is “not about discrimination… It is about safeguarding the best environment for children” (JSTOR Daily, n.d.).


2004–2006 — ADF Writes State Marriage Amendment Language; Federal Marriage Amendment Fails Twice

[Political / Legal]

Anti-gay groups meet in Washington, D.C., immediately after the 2004 ballot sweep to plan campaigns in 10 more states for 2005 (SPLC — Anti-Gay Movement, n.d.). ADF literally writes the original language for same-sex marriage bans in Idaho (2005), Colorado (2006), and South Carolina (2006) (HRC — 10 Shocking Facts About ADF, n.d.). ADF senior counsel Michael Norton is identified as the drafter of Colorado’s Amendment 43 (HRC — 10 Things, 2014). In 2004 and 2006, Congress votes on two iterations of the Federal Marriage Amendment — both fail to reach 60 votes in the Senate (Brennan Center, n.d.). The federal constitutional strategy is abandoned; the state-by-state model legislation strategy is confirmed as the primary mechanism.


2005–2010 — Mike Johnson at ADF; “Day of Truth”; Blackstone Fellowship Pipeline

[Political / Legal]

Mike Johnson works as an attorney for ADF from 2002 to 2010, filing an amicus brief aiming to criminalize gay sex and writing publicly that homosexual relationships are “inherently unnatural” and a “dangerous lifestyle” (Rolling Stone, 2023). In 2004 he writes that if gay people receive the right to marry, “pedophiles and others would be next in line” and that gay marriage was “the dark harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy that could doom even the strongest republic.” In 2005, ADF launches the “Day of Truth” — a counterprotest to the “Day of Silence” against anti-LGBTQ+ bullying — at which Johnson distributes T-shirts reading “The Truth Cannot be Silenced.” From 2006 to 2010, Johnson and ADF collaborate with Exodus International to run the annual Day of Truth in schools nationwide (CNN KFile via AOL, 2023). Exodus International shuts down in 2013, its president publishing a public apology for “pain and hurt” caused. Johnson is elected to Congress in 2016 and House Speaker in 2023. ADF’s Blackstone Fellowship — a pipeline program for Christian law students — produces ADF-aligned attorneys placed in legislatures, courts, and advocacy organizations across the country throughout this period (Rolling Stone, 2023).


2005–2016 — ADF Develops “Student Physical Privacy Act” Model Legislation

[Political / Legal]

Following the marriage amendment wave, ADF turns to a parallel track: model legislation restricting trans students’ access to bathrooms and locker rooms. ADF drafts the Student Physical Privacy Act (SPPA), which bills in Minnesota, Kansas, Texas, Illinois, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Nevada are later found to mirror — in some cases word-for-word (NBC News, 2017). In December 2014, ADF sends letters to school boards in Minnesota, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Wisconsin warning of litigation if they adopt trans-inclusive bathroom policies, while simultaneously commissioning anti-trans white papers from ACPeds (SPLC — ADF/ACPeds, 2024). In March 2016, North Carolina passes House Bill 2 (HB2) — the first state law in U.S. history to regulate public bathroom use based on trans identity — within 11 hours and 10 minutes of introduction (Slate, 2024). The resulting economic damage and Governor Pat McCrory’s electoral defeat make HB2 the template for what the network needs to do differently — shift the target from bathrooms in general public spaces to schools and children specifically, which is precisely what the 2021–present wave does (Axios Raleigh, 2026).


2008 — California Proposition 8; LDS Church Mobilization

[Political]

California voters pass Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, with 52% of the vote after the California Supreme Court had legalized it that year. The “Yes on 8” campaign raises $39.9 million — the most expensive social-issue ballot campaign in American history at that point (NBC News, 2009). The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) mobilizes its California membership through a letter read in every congregation urging members to “do all you can” to support the measure and solicits a $10 million internal fundraising goal (Religion Dispatches, 2010). Mormon donors account for approximately 46% of total financial support for Proposition 8 (NPR, 2008). ADF provides legal support to the “Protect Marriage” coalition. McHugh files an amicus brief in favor of Proposition 8 (GLAAD, n.d.). The California Fair Political Practices Commission later fines the LDS Church $5,539 for underreporting its contributions (Fox News, 2010).


2010–2011 — DADT Repealed; Network Opposition

[Political / Military]

On December 22, 2010, President Obama signs the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010, passed by the Senate 65–31 and the House 250–175 (Archives Foundation, n.d.). DADT officially ends September 20, 2011, after Obama, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen provide required certification on July 22, 2011 (Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) History, n.d.).

Organizations opposing repeal: FRC calls repeal “a tragic day for our armed forces” hijacked by “a radical social agenda” (SPLC, 2010). FRC’s Peter Sprigg tells MSNBC the repeal is “guaranteed” to lead to gay-on-straight sexual assault (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR), 2010). FRC holds a national webcast titled “Mission Compromised: How the Military is Being Used to Advance a Radical Agenda” (Dallas Voice, 2010). Perkins cites ACPeds on live television to claim “homosexuality poses a danger to children” in the same breath as opposing DADT repeal — connecting the military fight directly to the broader anti-LGBTQ+ pseudoscience network (SPLC — Tony Perkins, n.d.). ADF opposes repeal on religious liberty grounds for chaplains (Christian Post, 2011). CMR’s Elaine Donnelly predicts the military will lose up to 500,000 service members — a prediction falsified within one year (Palm Center, 2012). The American Family Association’s (AFA) Bryan Fischer claims on radio that “homosexuals in the military gave us the Brown Shirts, the Nazi war machine and 6 million dead Jews” (SPLC — AFA, n.d.). Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy (CSP) warns open gay service could force a return to the draft (Palm Center, 2012). Heritage publishes analysis arguing repeal would damage military readiness. The pattern is identical to 1993 and will be recycled again in 2017 against transgender service.


2012 — Restored Hope Network Founded

[Religious / Clinical / Funding Network]

In spring 2012, hardline ex-gay ministries break from Exodus International after president Alan Chambers announces there is no “cure” for homosexuality. The Restored Hope Network (RHN) is founded in Sacramento, led by Exodus co-founder Frank Worthen of New Hope Ministries, Andrew and Annette Comiskey of Desert Stream Ministries, and Anne Paulk — formerly manager of the Homosexuality and Gender Department at Focus on the Family, where she co-founded Focus’s “Love Won Out” ex-gay conferences (Political Research Associates, 2013). RHN’s Board of References includes Dobson, Albert Mohler, and Christopher West — positioning it directly inside the Dobson/Focus on the Family network. NARTH co-founder Joseph Nicolosi joins its board.

Funding: RHN explicitly instructs donors on its website to give through the National Christian Foundation (NCF), via “the NCF Restored Hope Network Single Charity Fund (#5396681),” and through Schwab’s donor-advised fund infrastructure, the Restored Hope Fund (#6916-6974) (Restored Hope Network, n.d.). NCF is the fourth-largest donor-advised fund in the United States, identified by Inside Philanthropy as “probably the single biggest source of money fueling the pro-life and anti-LGBT movements over the past 15 years” (Salon, 2021). NCF’s three-year IRS filings (2015–2017) show it funneling $56.1 million from anonymous donors to 23 SPLC-designated hate groups — its largest recipients are ADF and FRC (Sludge, 2019). NCF’s donors include the DeVos family, the Anschutz oil network, Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy, and the late billionaire Foster Friess (Salon, 2021).


2013 — DSM-5 Replaces “Gender Identity Disorder” with “Gender Dysphoria”; Exodus International Closes

[Clinical]

The American Psychiatric Association (2013) publishes DSM-5, eliminating “gender identity disorder” and replacing it with “gender dysphoria” — focused on distress that may accompany gender incongruence, not on trans identity itself. The APA (n.d.) states explicitly that “gender non-conformity is not in itself a mental disorder.” The First Circuit Court of Appeals’ (2013) DSM-5 fact sheet clarifies: “The critical element of gender dysphoria is the presence of clinically significant distress associated with the condition.” Britannica (n.d.) confirms this shift “removes the connotation that people with gender nonconformity are ‘disordered’ by only pathologizing the discontent experienced by these patients.”

The APA (n.d.) itself acknowledges the unresolved tension: “discussions continue among advocates and medical professionals about how best to preserve access to gender transition-related health care while also minimizing the degree to which such diagnostic categories stigmatize the very people that physicians are attempting to help.” The anti-LGBTQ+ network exploits this directly. The Trump administration’s 2025 HHS report, co-authored by a SEGM founder, cites the continued existence of “gender dysphoria” in DSM-5 as a clinical basis for restricting care while making no reference to ICD-11’s full depathologization (Transgender Map, 2025).

In June 2013, Exodus International closes entirely. Alan Chambers issues a formal apology: “I am sorry for the pain and hurt many of you have experienced. I am sorry that some of you spent years working through the shame and guilt you felt when your attractions didn’t change” (CNN, 2013). The closure is not the end of the conversion therapy infrastructure — it is a schism, with the hardline wing already operational as the Restored Hope Network.


2013/2016 — Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) Founded

[Political / Legal]

The Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) is founded in 2013 by Lierre Keith and incorporated in 2016, earning 501(c)(3) nonprofit status in 2018 (SourceWatch, n.d.). It identifies as a radical feminist organization and has “found an increasingly influential platform by teaming up with conservatives” according to the Washington Post as cited by SourceWatch. Its function in the anti-trans network is structural: it provides a nominally feminist, nominally left-wing face for legislative and legal campaigns organized and funded by the Christian right.

In 2016, WoLF receives a $15,000 grant from ADF to fund a lawsuit challenging the Obama administration’s Title IX guidance on gender identity (Transgender Map, n.d.). Total documented ADF grants to WoLF reach $65,000 (GLAAD, n.d.). WoLF files amicus briefs alongside ADF in G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board and Doe v. Boyertown Area School District, opposing trans students’ access to bathrooms (Media Matters, 2019). In 2017, WoLF partners with the Hands Across the Aisle Coalition (HATAC) — a self-described coalition of “radical feminists, lesbians, Christians and conservatives that are tabling our ideological differences to stand in solidarity against gender identity legislation” — along with Concerned Parents and Educators and the Family Policy Alliance (FPA) to submit a petition to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) arguing for the exclusion of trans women from women’s homeless shelters (Trans Data Library, n.d.; Political Research Associates, 2020).

In 2019, three WoLF members appear on a Heritage Foundation panel on the Equality Act, where Kara Dansky argues that if the Equality Act passes, “male rapists will go to women’s prisons” and “girls who would have taken first place will be denied scholastic opportunity” (Trans Data Library, n.d.). A Heritage legislator attending that panel later invites WoLF’s Natasha Chart and Dansky to testify in support of South Dakota anti-trans healthcare legislation (Political Research Associates, 2020). WoLF’s function in the network is precisely what the anti-LGBTQ+ network has sought since Save Our Children in 1977: a non-religious, progressive-coded framing for the same legislative agenda. The framing is new. The infrastructure, the funding, and the bills are the same.


2014 — NARTH Rebrands as Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity (ATCSI)

[Clinical / Political]

Following the DSM-5’s replacement of “Gender Identity Disorder” with “Gender Dysphoria” in 2013, the World Medical Association’s condemnation of conversion therapy in 2013, and increasing legislative bans on conversion therapy for minors — beginning with California in 2012 — NARTH rebrands as the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity (ATCSI), also operating under the name “the NARTH Institute,” in 2014 (World Religions & Spirituality Project, 2022). The rebrand is partly driven by NARTH having lost its tax-exempt status in 2012 and by the increasing political toxicity of the term “conversion therapy” (SPLC, 2015). ATCSI creates five organizational divisions — including one framed around “client rights” and “therapeutic choice” — and in 2016 formally adopts new terminology to avoid the phrase “sexual orientation change efforts” (SOCE), instead using language about “unwanted homosexual attractions” and therapeutic “exploration” (SPLC — Unwanted, 2026). The rebrand is a direct structural precursor to the “gender exploratory therapy” framing the Gender Exploratory Therapy Association (GETA) will deploy starting in 2021. ATCSI lists GETA’s co-founders as affiliated members and GETA lists ATCSI as a partner organization (Trans Data Library, n.d.).


2016 — McHugh and Mayer Publish The New Atlantis Report; Pentagon Lifts Transgender Military Ban

[Clinical / Political / Military]

In August 2016, McHugh co-authors a 143-page “special report” with biostatistician Lawrence Mayer — published in The New Atlantis, a non-peer-reviewed journal affiliated with EPPC — titled “Sexuality and Gender: Findings from the Biological, Psychological, and Social Sciences” (HRC, n.d.). The Advocate (2016) notes that Mayer has never published a single article on human sexuality or gender, and that McHugh “has a long history of blocking such efforts.” Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal promotes the report immediately on publication. Following publication, 600 Hopkins faculty, students, and alumni sign a petition demanding the university disavow the paper. Hopkins announces the re-opening of its gender clinic, which reopens in 2017 as the Center for Transgender and Gender Expansive Health (STAT News, 2022). In 2019, McHugh files an amicus brief in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), arguing against Title VII protections for transgender workers (McHugh, 2019). As of 2026 he is 94 years old and still giving media interviews (EWTN, 2026).

On June 30, 2016, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announces the end of the Pentagon’s longstanding ban on transgender people serving openly in the U.S. military (Washington Post, 2016). A RAND Corporation study estimates 2,500 to 15,500 transgender service members in active duty and reserves. Carter states: “We have transgender soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines — real, patriotic Americans — who I know are being hurt by an outdated, confusing, inconsistent application of the rules.” FRC’s Tony Perkins writes that lifting the ban would be “a fatal blow to unit cohesion and readiness” (Media Matters, 2014). CMR’s Elaine Donnelly recycles the same predictions made about DADT repeal (Media Matters, 2014).


2016–2018 — “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” Constructed; the ROGD Pipeline

[Clinical / Political]

The concept of “rapid onset gender dysphoria” (ROGD) — the idea that trans identity spreads like a social contagion among adolescents — is not invented by an academic. It originates in 2016 on three anti-trans parent blogs: 4thWaveNow, TransgenderTrend, and YouthTransCriticalProfessionals (Trans Data Library, n.d.). In July 2016, all three websites post recruitment requests for respondents to a survey for a paper by Dr. Lisa Littman (SPLC — Foundations, n.d.). Crucially, ADF warns supporters about ROGD in an email on August 24, 2016 — during the participant recruitment phase and long before the results become public, citing a National Review column that links to 4thWaveNow and TransgenderTrend (SPLC — Foundations, n.d.). ACPeds cites the anonymous 4thWaveNow blog in a press release describing gender dysphoria as a “social contagion” (Trans Data Library, n.d.). Littman’s paper is published in PLOS ONE in August 2018 — its methodology recruiting survey participants exclusively from the anti-trans websites that originated the theory (MIT Technology Review, 2022). PLOS ONE subsequently publishes an apology noting that ROGD is “not a clinically validated phenomenon or a diagnostic guideline.” WPATH publishes a statement dismissing ROGD as a valid diagnosis in September 2018. The American Psychological Association (APA) and 61 other healthcare organizations publish a joint statement disavowing ROGD in 2021. Despite its rejection by every major medical body, ROGD becomes central to legislative testimony, ADF amicus briefs, Heritage Foundation publications, and the Trump administration’s 2025 HHS report.


2019 — Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM) Founded

[Clinical / Funding Network]

The Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine (SEGM) is founded by Roberto D’Angelo, Anastassis Spiliadis, and others whose leadership substantially overlaps with Genspect (Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) — Pseudoscience Network, 2023). The SPLC designates SEGM an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group. Its primary activities are providing members as expert witnesses in litigation opposing gender-affirming care and filing amicus briefs worldwide (Trans Data Library, n.d.). Nearly a third of SEGM’s 2024 revenue comes directly from DonorsTrust (Reed, 2026). Additional funders include the Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund — over $350,000 (SPLC — Pseudoscience Network, 2023) — and the Edward Charles Foundation (Undark, 2024).

SEGM’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 Schedule I (primary source: ProPublica, n.d., EIN 844520593) shows it routing $10,000 to United Charitable (EIN 20-4286082) — a Virginia-based donor-advised fund (DAF) functioning as a re-anonymization layer. SEGM co-founder Zhenya Abbruzzese co-authors the Trump administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) report on gender dysphoria in 2025 (Reed, 2026). Texas Attorney General (AG) Ken Paxton cites SEGM twice in a legal opinion arguing gender-affirming care for minors constitutes child abuse (Undark, 2024). A Yale School of Medicine research team describes SEGM’s 14 core members as “a small group of repeat players in anti-trans activities” (SPLC — Pseudoscience Network, 2023).


2019 — Kelsey Coalition Founded; Parent Anti-Trans Network Formalizes

[Political]

The Kelsey Coalition is founded in March 2019 under a pseudonym (“Katherine Cave”), named after Food and Drug Administration (FDA) pharmacologist Frances Kelsey (Transgender Map, n.d.). In 2019, the Kelsey Coalition collaborates with the Minnesota Family Council — affiliated with the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and Focus on the Family — to produce a national “Gender Resource Guide,” co-produced with the Family Policy Alliance (FPA), the Heritage Foundation, the Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF), and Parents of ROGD Kids (Transgender Map, n.d.). Kelsey Coalition members appear at multiple Heritage Foundation panels in 2019, alongside Ryan T. Anderson of Heritage and Walt Heyer — a prominent anti-trans detransitioner (Transgender Map, n.d.). The parent anti-trans network in this period — 4thWaveNow, Parents of ROGD Kids, the Kelsey Coalition, and TransgenderTrend — is the civil society infrastructure for the ROGD pipeline: it produces the survey respondents, the legislative witnesses, and the “concerned parents” deployed in statehouses.


2019/2022 — ICD-11 Moves “Gender Incongruence” Out of Mental Disorders

[Clinical]

The World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) releases the International Classification of Diseases, eleventh revision (ICD-11), formally adopted in May 2019 and taking effect January 1, 2022. It removes all gender identity categories from Chapter 6 (Mental and Behavioural Disorders) and places “gender incongruence” in the newly created Chapter 17: Conditions Related to Sexual Health. The WHO (n.d.) states: “This reflects current knowledge that trans-related and gender diverse identities are not conditions of mental ill-health, and that classifying them as such can cause enormous stigma.” The term “transsexualism” — which had appeared in ICD-10 as a mental disorder — is eliminated entirely.

Sam Winter, a public health professor at Curtin University and member of the WHO Working Group on Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health, tells NBC News: “This is a historic move. An end to a classification that was a historical artifact, had little basis in science, and had massive consequences for the lives of trans people” (Jacobs & Haas, 2019). ICD-11 also removes residual diagnoses for same-sex attraction used to justify conversion therapy (Jacobs & Haas, 2019).

The same year ICD-11 takes effect, SEGM files amicus briefs against gender-affirming care in courts worldwide (SPLC — Pseudoscience Network, 2023), Do No Harm produces model legislation to ban it (HuffPost, 2024), and DonorsTrust funds both (Reed, 2026). As Robles et al. (2022) document in the Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, the gap between DSM and ICD has been deliberately exploited by the anti-LGBTQ+ legislative network.


2021 — Arkansas HB1570; Coordinated Legislative Campaign Begins; Genspect Founded; Biden Restores Transgender Military Service

[Political / Legal / Military]

Arkansas becomes the first state to make gender-affirming care for patients under 18 illegal, passing House Bill 1570 (HB1570) over a Republican governor’s veto (Arkansas Advocates, 2021). Governor Hutchinson calls it “government overreach” and “letting lawmakers interfere with healthcare.” The legislature overrides him 71–24 (TIME, 2021). The bill’s language is nearly identical to model legislation produced by a coalition led by ADF, the Family Policy Alliance, and Heritage Foundation (EXPOSEDbyCMD, 2021). Genspect is founded this year by Stella O’Malley in Ireland; in leaked recordings O’Malley describes her mission as stopping children from medically transitioning (Trans Data Library, n.d.). The SPLC designates Genspect an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.

On January 25, 2021 — Day One of the Biden administration — Biden signs Executive Order 14004 (EO 14004), “Enabling All Qualified Americans to Serve Their Country in Uniform,” revoking the Trump ban and restoring the Obama-era policy allowing transgender service members to serve openly (Biden EO 14004, 2021). Gender-affirming medical care is covered; records of those previously discharged may be corrected.


2021 — Gender Exploratory Therapy Association (GETA) / Therapy First Founded

[Clinical / Political / Funding Network]

The Gender Exploratory Therapy Association (GETA) is founded in late 2021 by Sasha Ayad, Roberto D’Angelo, Stella O’Malley, Lisa Marchiano, and Genspect adviser Joseph Burgo — all of whom are simultaneously on the boards of SEGM and Genspect (SPLC — Pseudoscience Network, 2023). The SPLC identifies the triad of SEGM, Genspect, and GETA as “the strongest triad within the anti-LGBT pseudoscience network,” sharing over two dozen personnel connections. GETA officially registers as a nonprofit in July 2022 and is subsequently renamed Therapy First. Its stated mission is to develop a network of “gender exploratory” therapists — mental health professionals who view non-cisgender gender identity primarily as psychological issues to work through rather than identities to affirm (Trans Data Library, n.d.). What GETA calls “gender exploratory therapy” (GET) is what every major medical and psychological organization calls conversion therapy: GETA members oppose conversion therapy bans precisely because such bans would include their practice. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) describes gender exploratory therapy as “delayed transition” (Transgender Map, n.d.). GETA’s advisor Stephen Levine is employed by ADF to testify against LGBTQ+ rights in federal cases (SPLC — Pseudoscience Network, 2023). GETA has ties to the Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity (ATCSI) — the rebranded NARTH — and produces the podcast Gender: A Wider Lens — co-hosted by O’Malley and Ayad, sponsored by Genspect and the Rethink Identity Medicine Ethics (RIME) project — as a primary vehicle for normalizing gender exploratory therapy (SPLC — Pseudoscience Network, 2023).

Funding: GETA/Therapy First brings in less than $50,000 in annual revenue — below the threshold requiring a full IRS Form 990 — meaning its exact funding is not publicly disclosed (Trans Data Library, n.d.). Its known revenue sources are therapist membership fees ($25/year per member) and individual donations. Its funding significance is not in its own revenue but in its personnel integration with SEGM and Genspect — both funded through DonorsTrust — meaning GETA’s clinical operations are functionally subsidized by the same dark money network. RIME reported spending nearly $7,000 in 2022 on the Gender: A Wider Lens podcast, connecting GETA’s public-facing advocacy directly to DonorsTrust-funded organizations.


2022 — Do No Harm Founded; Florida “Don’t Say Gay” Law; Legislative Wave Accelerates; Institute for Comprehensive Gender Dysphoria Research (ICGDR) Formalized

[Political / Legal / Funding Network / Clinical]

Do No Harm is founded by Stanley Goldfarb, presenting itself as a grassroots doctors’ organization. Documented incoming funding: $1 million seed from Joseph Edelman and his wife Suzy, who calls “transgenderism” a “fiction designed to destroy” (HuffPost, 2023); $750,000 from Leonard Leo’s Concord Fund (HuffPost, 2024); approximately $3 million total from the Leo network (The Advocate, 2024). The SPLC designates Do No Harm an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group.

Do No Harm’s IRS Form 990 Schedule I (primary source: ProPublica, n.d., EIN 874701865) shows outgoing grants to: Talent Market (EIN 52-1928321, DonorsTrust’s staffing arm — DeSmog, n.d.); DAFgiving360 / Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc. (EIN 31-1640316, formerly Schwab Charitable — donors routed over $2 million each to ADF and Focus on the Family between 2019–2023 (Uncloseted Media, 2026)); Benjamin Rush Institute (EIN 46-1848302, free-market medical school recruitment organization embedded in the State Policy Network (SourceWatch, n.d.)); Heritage Foundation (EIN 23-7327730); and Family Policy Foundation (EIN 46-4577178, the 501(c)(3) arm of the Family Policy Alliance — identified by the SPLC as the single most influential organization behind the 2021–present wave of anti-trans state legislation (Baptist News Global, 2023)).

Florida’s House Bill 1557 (HB1557) — the “Don’t Say Gay” law — passes and is signed by Governor DeSantis. Anti-trans bills are introduced in 174 states; 26 pass. The Trans Legislation Tracker (2025) documents a 2,489% increase in anti-trans bills since 2015.

The Institute for Comprehensive Gender Dysphoria Research (ICGDR), founded by Lisa Littman in 2021 and receiving its 501(c)(3) status in 2022 (EIN 85-2892486), formalizes this year as the primary research vehicle for ROGD. Its 2024 IRS Form 990 (primary source: ProPublica, n.d.) shows total revenue of $226,000 — nearly 90% of which comes from two organizations: DonorsTrust and the Santa Fe Boys Educational Foundation, the latter of which makes its largest single-year donation in its history ($100,000) to ICGDR in 2024 (Reed, 2026). The Santa Fe Boys Fund is also a documented funder of Genspect. The board of ICGDR is the board of GETA is the board of Genspect: co-principal officer Stella O’Malley, treasurer J. Michael Bailey of Northwestern University, and president Lisa Littman.


2022–present — Chloe Cole and the Detransitioner Industry

[Political / Legal / Funding Network]

Chloe Cole — born 2004, who detransitioned before age 18 — is deployed as a patient advocate by Do No Harm, which facilitates her access to congressional testimony and state legislative hearings (Daily Northwestern, 2024). In 2024, Cole testifies in an Ohio court and is recorded stating she earns upwards of $200,000 per year opposing transgender care — through speaking engagements, Donorbox donations, and employment with Do No Harm (Reed, 2024). Cole is represented by Harmeet Dhillon and the Center for American Liberty in her lawsuit against Kaiser Permanente (Trans Data Library, n.d.). She speaks alongside Daily Wire host Matt Walsh and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene at a Do No Harm-organized rally on the steps of the Supreme Court on December 4, 2024 (National Catholic Register, 2024). She is invited as House Speaker Mike Johnson’s special guest at the State of the Union address. The SPLC (2026) documents that anti-LGBTQ+ hate groups have systematically weaponized detransitioner experiences to support the “social contagion” theory. Elisa Rae Shupe’s account of how detransitioners were recruited by this network — “a lot of these women have serious mental health issues and way too much time on their hands… that plays a role in them getting sucked into the GC movement and subsequently radicalized” — is documented in KELOLAND News (2023).


2023 — Record Legislative Wave; Coordinated Campaign Exposed; Project 2025 Published

[Political / Funding Network]

More than 492 anti-transgender bills are filed in 47 states (Axios, 2023). DonorsTrust IRS Form 990 filings (primary source: ProPublica, n.d.) confirm simultaneous grants to SEGM, Do No Harm, ADF, and $365,000 to Heritage earmarked for “Going On Offense On Gender Ideology” (NOTUS, 2024). Heritage president Kevin Roberts states publicly: “You outlaw it.” Detransitioner Elisa Shupe describes to KELOLAND News how detransitioners were recruited: “A lot of these women have serious mental health issues and way too much time on their hands. They’re sitting at home on disability with nothing to do, just like I was and still am, and that plays a role in them getting sucked into the gender-critical (GC) movement and subsequently radicalized” (KELOLAND News, 2023).

Heritage publishes Project 2025. It equates being transgender to pornography, calls for cutting federal funding for gender-affirming care at all ages, and directs HHS to adopt a “biblically based” definition of family. It describes gender-affirming care for youth as a “social contagion” (Wisconsin Watch, 2024; 19th News, 2024).


January 20–28, 2025 — Trump Executive Orders; Transgender Military Ban Reinstated

[Political / Legal / Military]

On his first day in office, Trump signs Executive Order 14168 (EO 14168) — “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government” — eliminating the “X” gender marker from passports and directing all federal agencies to recognize only two sexes defined at conception (American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), 2025). Within 24 hours the State Department begins holding passports submitted by transgender people (Lambda Legal, n.d.). On January 20, Trump also revokes Biden’s EO 14004, reinstating the transgender military ban (The Hill, 2025). On January 27, Trump signs EO 14183 formally banning transgender people from military service — the same ban Trump imposed by tweet in 2017 and Biden revoked in 2021. On January 28, he signs EO 14187 — “Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation” — directing federal agencies to withhold funds from providers offering gender-affirming care to anyone under 19 (LGBTQ+ Bar Association, n.d.). Anti-trans politicians had spent more than $215 million on ads scapegoating trans people in the 2024 election cycle (ACLU, 2025).


January 27, 2025 — Elisa Rae Shupe Dies

[Witness]

Seven days after Trump begins signing executive orders targeting trans people, Elisa Rae Shupe — a nonbinary Army veteran who served nearly two decades, became the first American to receive legal recognition as nonbinary, and had been discharged in the weeks prior to her death — dies by suicide at the Syracuse VA Medical Center, found wrapped in a transgender pride flag (Task & Purpose, 2025). In her note she refuses a military burial. Journalist Sue Kerr writes: “I do not believe Elisa was broken by her identity. She was broken by failed systems, including her family of origin and the military as well as the anti-transgender movement” (Xtra Magazine, 2023). Her life traces the exact arc this timeline documents: a neurologically grounded identity that persisted despite military suppression, family rejection, inadequate medical care, deliberate exploitation by the legislative network, a public detransition performed under duress, a private reality that never changed, and the weight of having been a weapon in a campaign she came to understand and condemn (KELOLAND News, 2023).


May 1, 2025 — HHS Gender Dysphoria Report Published

[Political / Clinical]

HHS publishes “Treatment for Pediatric Gender Dysphoria: Review of Evidence and Best Practices” — commissioned by EO 14187. Authors are not disclosed until November 19, 2025, when SEGM co-founder Zhenya Abbruzzese is identified as a co-author (Reed, 2026). The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) characterizes the report as “misrepresent[ing] the current medical consensus.” The American Psychological Association (APA) states the concealment of authorship “undermines scientific rigor and contradicts standards for evidence-based policymaking” (PBS NewsHour, 2025). The pipeline is documented: DonorsTrust funds SEGM (Reed, 2026) → SEGM provides medical credentialing → SEGM personnel author the federal report used to justify stripping healthcare access. The report cites the DSM-5 “gender dysphoria” diagnosis while ignoring ICD-11’s full depathologization, and adopts EPPC’s framing of gender-affirming care as “sex-rejecting procedures” (Transgender Map, 2025; Important Context, 2026).


May 2025 — Focus on the Family Designated SPLC Hate Group

[Political]

Focus on the Family — founded by Dobson in 1977 — is classified as an anti-LGBTQ+ hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), 48 years after its founding (SPLC — Focus on the Family, n.d.).


June 18, 2025 — United States v. Skrmetti

[Legal]

The Supreme Court rules 6-3 to uphold Tennessee’s Senate Bill 1 (SB1), banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth under 18 (United States v. Skrmetti, 605 U.S. ___ (2025)). Chief Justice Roberts writes for the majority, joined by Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett — all nominees shaped or selected by Leonard Leo. The court holds the law is subject only to rational basis review (Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), 2025). The ruling leaves bans in place in 25 states (Human Rights Campaign (HRC), 2025). Sotomayor, Jackson, and Kagan dissent (American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), 2025). The Trevor Project (2025) reports anti-transgender state laws directly caused a 72% increase in suicide attempts among transgender and nonbinary youth. The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority was assembled by Leonard Leo (TIME, 2025) — the same Leonard Leo who funds Do No Harm (HuffPost, 2024), sits on the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s (EPPC) board, and whose Marble Freedom Trust gave $41 million to DonorsTrust in 2021.


November 2025 — Supreme Court Allows Discriminatory Passport Policy; USCCB Bans Gender-Affirming Care at Catholic Hospitals

[Legal / Political]

The Supreme Court grants the Trump administration’s request to stay a preliminary injunction in Orr v. Trump, allowing the passport policy to be enforced while the ACLU’s challenge continues (ACLU, 2025; PBS NewsHour, 2025). Jackson, Sotomayor, and Kagan dissent.

In the same month, the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) adopts new Ethical and Religious Directives (ERDs) banning gender-affirming care at every Catholic hospital in the United States — without consulting the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) or any mainstream healthcare organization. New Ways Ministry states: “The directives adopted by the USCCB will harm, not benefit transgender persons… it gives a blessing to people who seek to deny, hurt, and too often, even murder transgender people” (New Ways Ministry, 2025). Catholic hospitals constitute the largest nonprofit hospital system in the United States.


2025–2026 — 914 Bills; The Network Operating as Designed

[Political]

In 2025, 914 anti-trans bills are introduced across 49 states and nationally — 109 pass. Texas leads with 130 bills (Trans Legislation Tracker, 2025). It is the fifth consecutive record-breaking year.

The scale of that number is only legible in light of everything documented above. The organizations that produced it are not a recent movement. Heritage, ALEC, Focus on the Family, FRC, and ADF predate most of the people they are now targeting by decades. The clinical infrastructure — McHugh’s methodologically fraudulent 1979 study, NARTH’s reparative therapy framework, EPPC’s non-peer-reviewed journal, ACPeds’ ADF-commissioned white papers, NARTH’s rebranding as ATCSI, the ROGD concept built on anonymous anti-trans blogs and promoted by ADF before the data were public, and the SEGM/GETA/Genspect triad funded through DonorsTrust — was not assembled in response to a sudden surge in trans visibility. It was assembled over fifty years specifically to provide the legislative and legal campaigns with a scientific-sounding foundation that mainstream medicine has repeatedly and uniformly rejected.

The money that funds it flows through four donor-advised fund layers — DonorsTrust, the National Christian Foundation (NCF), DAFgiving360, and Fidelity Charitable — that make the donors legally invisible while preserving their tax benefit. The Koch network, the Bradley Foundation, Leonard Leo’s Marble Freedom Trust, the DeVos and Mercer families, the Edelmans, and Barre Seid’s fortune are documented contributors. The same dollars fund the legal strategy at ADF, the legislative model bills at Heritage and the Family Policy Alliance, the clinical pseudoscience at SEGM and ICGDR, and the deployment of paid detransitioners as witnesses at up to $200,000 per year through Do No Harm (Reed, 2026; American Journal News, 2023; Atmos, 2025).

The 1973 network and the 2025 network are not parallel structures. They are the same structure, funded by the same money, running the same arguments — children at risk, social contagion, disordered identity, religious liberty — through successively updated institutional vehicles. What changed is not the goal. What changed is the target.


REFERENCES

ABC News. (2013, June 20). Exodus International: ‘Gay cure’ group leader shutting down ministry after change of heart. https://abcnews.go.com/US/exodus-international-gay-cure-group-leader-shutting-ministry/story?id=19446752

American Archive of Public Broadcasting. (n.d.). The backlash against gay rights in Florida (1977). https://americanarchive.org/primary_source_sets/conservatism/9-507-qn5z60ct7w

American Civil Liberties Union. (2025, January 27). Trump’s executive orders promoting sex discrimination, explained. https://www.aclu.org/news/lgbtq-rights/trumps-executive-orders-promoting-sex-discrimination-explained

American Civil Liberties Union. (2025, June 18). ACLU, Lambda Legal respond to Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. Skrmetti. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/aclu-lambda-legal-respond-to-supreme-court-ruling-in-u-s-v-skrmetti

American Civil Liberties Union. (2025, November). Supreme Court allows Trump administration to enforce discriminatory passport policy. https://www.aclu.org/press-releases/supreme-court-allows-trump-administration-to-enforce-discriminatory-passport-policy

American Journal News. (2023, May 30). The dark money funding conservative anti-trans groups. https://americanjournalnews.com/dark-money-conservative-anti-trans-movement/

American Presidency Project. (1993, July 19). Remarks announcing the new policy on homosexuals in the military. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/remarks-announcing-the-new-policy-homosexuals-the-military

American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.).

American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.).

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.).

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

American Psychiatric Association. (n.d.). Gender dysphoria diagnosis. https://www.psychiatry.org/psychiatrists/diversity/education/transgender-and-gender-nonconforming-patients/gender-dysphoria-diagnosis

Archives Foundation. (n.d.). Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010. https://archivesfoundation.org/documents/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-act-2010/

Armiak, D. (2021, April 2). The pro-LGBTQ companies that helped elect Arkansas anti-trans bill sponsors. EXPOSEDbyCMD. https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2021/04/02/the-pro-lgbtq-companies-that-helped-elect-arkansas-anti-trans-bill-sponsors/

Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. (2021, June). Pride month and a reflection on Arkansas’s recent passage of anti-transgender legislation. https://www.aradvocates.org/pride-month-and-a-reflection-on-arkansass-recent-passage-of-anti-transgender-legislation/

Atmos. (2025, July 25). Fossil fuel billionaires are bankrolling the anti-trans movement. https://atmos.earth/political-landscapes/fossil-fuel-billionaires-are-bankrolling-the-anti-trans-movement/

Axios. (2023, March 31). The forces behind anti-trans bills across the U.S. https://www.axios.com/2023/03/31/anti-trans-bills-2023-america

Axios Raleigh. (2026, March 23). HB2’s lasting economic and political legacy in N.C. https://www.axios.com/local/raleigh/2026/03/23/house-bill-2-north-carolina-economy-modern-culture-fights-bathroom-bill

Baltimore Magazine. (2019, December 22). Johns Hopkins gender identity clinic: A history. https://www.baltimoremagazine.com/section/health/johns-hopkins-gender-identity-clinic-transgender-surgery/

Ballotpedia. (n.d.). History of same-sex marriage ballot measures. https://ballotpedia.org/History_of_same-sex_marriage_ballot_measures

Baptist News Global. (2023, May 31). Focus on the Family affiliate is the unifying force behind campaign to restrict transgender rights. https://baptistnews.com/article/focus-on-the-family-affiliate-is-the-unifying-force-behind-campaign-to-restrict-transgender-rights/

Biden, J. R. (2021, January 25). Executive Order 14004 — Enabling all qualified Americans to serve their country in uniform. Federal Register. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/DCPD-202100083/pdf/DCPD-202100083.pdf

Brennan Center for Justice. (n.d.). The improbable victory of marriage equality. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/improbable-victory-marriage-equality

Britannica. (n.d.). Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. https://www.britannica.com/event/Dont-Ask-Dont-Tell

Britannica. (n.d.). Focus on the Family. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Focus-on-the-Family

Britannica. (n.d.). Gender dysphoria. https://www.britannica.com/science/gender-dysphoria

Britannica. (n.d.). GLAAD. https://www.britannica.com/topic/GLAAD

Burton, N. (2015, September 18). When homosexuality stopped being a mental disorder. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/hide-and-seek/201509/when-homosexuality-stopped-being-a-mental-disorder

CBS News. (2004, November 3). 11 states ban same-sex marriage. https://cbsnews.com/news/11-states-ban-same-sex-marriage

Center for Military Readiness. (n.d.). About Elaine Donnelly. https://www.cmrlink.org/about-elaine-donnelly

Christian Post. (2011, July 23). DADT repeal unfounded, defies religious freedom, ADF says. https://www.christianpost.com/news/dadt-repeal-unfounded-defies-religious-freedom-adf-says.html

CNN. (2013, June 20). Group apologizes to gay community, then shuts down ‘cure’ ministry. https://www.cnn.com/2013/06/20/us/exodus-international-shutdown/index.html

CNN KFile via AOL. (2023, October 27). Before he became a politician, House Speaker Mike Johnson partnered with an anti-gay conversion therapy group. https://www.aol.com/became-politician-house-speaker-mike-113706083.html

Conservative Transparency. (n.d.). Alliance Defending Freedom. http://conservativetransparency.org/org/alliance-defending-freedom/

Daily Northwestern. (2024, February 28). NU College Republicans hosts “detransitioned” activist Chloe Cole. https://dailynorthwestern.com/2024/02/28/lateststories/nu-college-republicans-hosts-detransitioned-activist-chloe-cole/

Dallas Voice. (2010, December 1). FRC to livestream military discrimination’s last gasps. https://dallasvoice.com/frc-to-livestream-military-discriminations-last-gasps/

DeSmog. (n.d.). Talent Market. https://www.desmog.com/talent-market/

Drescher, J. (2010). Transsexualism, gender identity disorder and the DSM. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 14(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359701003589637

EBSCO Research Starters. (n.d.). Antigay and antilesbian Briggs Initiative is defeated. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/antigay-and-antilesbian-briggs-initiative-defeated

EBSCO Research Starters. (n.d.). Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy is implemented. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/social-sciences-and-humanities/dont-ask-dont-tell-policy-implemented

EWTN News. (2026, March 14). Psychiatrist Dr. Paul McHugh speaks about his decades-long career and the transgender movement. https://www.ewtnnews.com/world/us/psychiatrist-dr-paul-mchugh-speaks-about-his-decades-long-career-and-the-transgender-movement

EXPOSEDbyCMD. (2020, January 22). Koch-favored DonorsTrust keeps funding anti-Muslim and anti-LGBTQ hate groups. https://www.exposedbycmd.org/2020/01/22/koch-favored-donorstrust-keeps-funding-anti-muslim-anti-lgbtq-hate-groups/

Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting. (2010). Don’t ask gays about Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. https://fair.org/extra/dont-ask-gays-about-dont-ask-dont-tell/

First Circuit Court of Appeals. (2013). Gender dysphoria [DSM-5 fact sheet]. United States Courts. https://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/sites/ca1/files/citations/Gender%20Dysphoria%20Fact%20Sheet.pdf

Fleming, M., Steinman, C., & Bocknek, G. (1980). Methodological problems in assessing sex-reassignment surgery: A reply to Meyer and Reter. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 9(5), 451–456. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02115944

Fox News/documentary coverage. (2010). New documentary exposes Mormon church’s alleged secret involvement in passage of Proposition 8. https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/new-documentary-exposes-mormon-churchs-alleged-secret-involvement-in-passage-of-proposition-8.amp

Gay & Lesbian Review. (2022, June 2). How 3 activists stopped the madness. https://glreview.org/article/how-3-activists-stopped-the-madness/

GLAAD. (n.d.). American College of Pediatricians. GLAAD Accountability Project. https://glaad.org/gap/american-college-pediatricians/

GLAAD. (n.d.). Family Research Council. GLAAD Accountability Project. https://glaad.org/gap/family-research-council-frc/

GLAAD. (n.d.). Paul McHugh. GLAAD Accountability Project. https://glaad.org/gap/paul-mchugh/

GLAAD. (n.d.). Women’s Liberation Front. GLAAD Accountability Project. https://glaad.org/gap/womens-liberation-front/

Heritage Foundation. (1993). The military gay ban: Why Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell don’t work. https://www.heritage.org/defense/report/the-military-gay-ban-why-dont-ask-dont-tell-dont-work

Heritage Foundation. (2005, July 15). Court of public opinion. https://www.heritage.org/marriage-and-family/commentary/court-public-opinion

HuffPost. (2023, October 31). Billionaire Joseph Edelman is quietly financing anti-trans advocacy across the U.S. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/joseph-edelman-political-donor-transgender_n_653a8605e4b0783c4ba04deb

HuffPost. (2024, June 25). A Leonard Leo-linked group is secretly funding legislative attacks on trans rights. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/leonard-leo-transgender-rights-do-no-harm_n_6679bd3fe4b09762019914a8

Human Rights Campaign. (n.d.). Far-right organization has long anti-gay history. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/far-right-organization-has-long-anti-gay-history

Human Rights Campaign. (n.d.). 10 shocking facts about the Alliance Defending Freedom. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/10-shocking-facts-about-the-alliance-defending-freedom

Human Rights Campaign. (n.d.). McHugh Exposed: HRC launches website debunking the junk science of Paul McHugh. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/mchugh-exposed-hrc-launches-website-debunking-the-junk-science-of-paul-mchu

Human Rights Campaign. (2014). 10 things you should know about the Alliance Defending Freedom [PDF]. https://assets2.hrc.org/files/assets/resources/10_Things_You_Should_Know_About_the_Alliance_Defending_Freedom_-_FINAL.pdf

Human Rights Campaign. (2025, April 11). Right wing labs: How state legislatures are driving anti-LGBTQ+ attacks at the federal level. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/right-wing-labs-how-state-legislatures-are-driving-anti-lgbtq-attacks-at-federal-level

Human Rights Campaign. (2025, June 18). Supreme Court shuts down access to healthcare for transgender youth in 27 states. https://www.hrc.org/press-releases/supreme-court-shuts-down-access-to-healthcare-for-transgender-youth-in-27-states-strengthening-legal-hurdles-in-the-fight-for-lgbtq-rights

Human Rights Watch. (2003, July 1). Lawrence v. Texas. https://www.hrw.org/news/2003/07/01/lawrence-v-texas

Important Context. (2026, February 9). HHS has been using anti-trans language from a Christian right think tank. https://www.importantcontext.news/p/hhs-is-using-anti-trans-language

InfluenceWatch. (n.d.). The Ethics and Public Policy Center (EPPC). https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/the-ethics-and-public-policy-center-eppc/

InfluenceWatch. (n.d.). United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/united-states-conference-of-catholic-bishops-usccb/

Jacobs, J., & Haas, A. (2019, May 28). ‘Transsexualism’ removed from World Health Organization’s disease manual. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/transsexualism-removed-world-health-organization-s-disease-manual-n885141

Johns Hopkins News-Letter. (2014, May 1). Hopkins Hospital: A history of sex reassignment. https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2014/05/hopkins-hospital-a-history-of-sex-reassignment-76004/

Joint Chiefs of Staff. (n.d.). SHS 15: Repealing DADT [declassified history]. https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/History/Dec21/SHS_15_Repealing_DADT.pdf

JSTOR Daily. (n.d.). Protecting kids from gay marriage. https://daily.jstor.org/protecting-kids-from-gay-marriage/

Kaiser Family Foundation. (2025, August 13). What are the implications of the Skrmetti ruling? https://www.kff.org/lgbtq/what-are-the-implications-of-the-skrmetti-ruling-for-minors-access-to-gender-affirming-care/

KELOLAND News. (2023). How outside involvement from an anti-trans coalition shaped South Dakota law. https://www.keloland.com/keloland-com-original/how-outside-involvement-from-an-anti-trans-coalition-shaped-south-dakota-law/

Lambda Legal. (n.d.). Passport and identity document information for the transgender community. https://lambdalegal.org/tgnc-checklist-under-trump/

LGBTQ+ Bar Association. (n.d.). Trump anti-LGBTQ+ executive order litigation tracker. https://lgbtqbar.org/programs/advocacy-resources/trump-executive-order-tracker/

LGBTQIA+ Midwest. (n.d.). A brief history of sexuality and gender identity classifications in the DSM and ICD. https://www.lgbtqiamidwest.org/chai-resources/a-brief-history-of-sexuality-and-gender-identity-classifications-in-the-dsm-and-icd

Magrath, W. J. (2022). The fall of the nation’s first gender-affirming surgery clinic. Annals of Internal Medicine, 175, 1462–1467. https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-1480

Making Gay History. (2024, March 9). Chapter five: Thank you, Anita [podcast episode]. https://makinggayhistory.org/podcast/chapter-five-thank-you-anita/

McHugh, P. R. (2019, August 22). Amicus curiae brief of Dr. Paul R. McHugh, M.D., in R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (No. 18-107). United States Supreme Court. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-107/113262/20190822151939369_TO%20PRINT%2019-8-22%20Dr.%20Paul%20McHugh%20Amicus%20Brief%20FINAL.pdf

Media Matters for America. (2014, September 23). Anti-gay pundits recycle doomsday DADT rhetoric to defend military’s transgender service ban. https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2014/09/23/anti-gay-pundits-recycle-doomsday-dadt-rhetoric/200852

Media Matters for America. (2019, February 26). Right-wing media and think tanks are aligning with fake feminists who dehumanize trans people. https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/right-wing-media-and-think-tanks-are-aligning-fake-feminists-who-dehumanize-trans

Media Matters for America. (2019, August 17). Right-wing and evangelical media helped land anti-trans parent group the Kelsey Coalition in USA Today. https://www.mediamatters.org/heritage-foundation/anti-trans-parent-group-kelsey-coalition-usa-today

Meyer, J. K., & Reter, D. J. (1979). Sex reassignment: Follow-up. Archives of General Psychiatry, 36(9), 1010–1015. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780090096010

MIT Technology Review. (2022, August 18). How the idea of a “transgender contagion” went viral — and caused untold harm. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/08/18/1057135/transgender-contagion-gender-dysphoria/

Monitoring Influence. (2024, November 18). Heritage Foundation. https://www.monitoringinfluence.org/org/heritage-foundation/

National Catholic Register. (2024, December 6). Detransitioner Chloe Cole speaks at rally on the steps of the Supreme Court. https://www.ncregister.com/cna/detransitioner-chloe-cole-speaks-at-scotus-rally

National Catholic Reporter. (n.d.). For US bishops, LGBTQ ‘anthropology’ rules out Equality Act compromises. https://www.ncronline.org/news/us-bishops-lgbtq-anthropology-rules-out-equality-act-compromises

National Center for Lesbian Rights. (n.d.). Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010. https://www.nclrights.org/our-work/legislation-policy/dont-ask-dont-tell-repeal-act-of-2010/

NBC News. (2009, February 3). More than $83 million spent on Prop 8. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna28985504

NBC News. (2013, June 20). ‘Ex-gay’ group says it’s shutting down; leader apologizes for ‘pain and hurt.’ https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ex-gay-group-says-its-shutting-down-leader-apologizes-pain-flna6c10389785

NBC News. (2017, March 3). This law firm is linked to anti-transgender bathroom bills across the country. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/law-firm-linked-anti-transgender-bathroom-bills-across-country-n741106

NBC News. (2022, April 14). How 1970s Christian crusader Anita Bryant helped spawn Florida’s LGBTQ culture war. https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/1970s-christian-crusader-anita-bryant-helped-spawn-floridas-lgbtq-cult-rcna24215

NBC News. (n.d.). Activists take aim at anti-LGBTQ hate group Alliance Defending Freedom. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/activists-takes-aim-anti-lgbtq-hate-group-alliance-defending-freedom-n936391

New Republic. (1993, February 22). Discrimination, 1948 and 1993 [archived]. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/scotts/OldFiles/ftp/bulgarians/military-48-93.html

New Republic. (2017, March). The abominable legacy of gay conversion therapy. https://newrepublic.com/article/141294/abominable-legacy-gay-conversion-therapy

New Ways Ministry. (2022, November 16). U.S. Bishops’ Conference elects president with anti-LGBTQ record. https://www.newwaysministry.org/2022/11/16/u-s-bishops-conference-elects-president-with-anti-lgbtq-record/

New Ways Ministry. (2024, November 27). U.S. Bishops act swiftly to implement transgender-negative declaration. https://www.newwaysministry.org/2024/11/27/u-s-bishops-act-swiftly-to-implement-transgender-negative-declaration/

New Ways Ministry. (2024, December 9). U.S. Bishops’ Conference seeks end to federal non-discrimination proposal. https://www.newwaysministry.org/2024/12/09/u-s-bishops-conference-seeks-end-to-federal-non-discrimination-proposal/

New Ways Ministry. (2025, November 13). New Ways Ministry criticizes U.S. Bishops on anti-trans health policies. https://www.newwaysministry.org/2025/11/13/new-ways-ministry-criticizes-u-s-bishops-on-anti-trans-health-policies/

Newsweek. (2019, April 2). America’s biggest Christian charity funnels tens of millions to hate groups. https://www.newsweek.com/biggest-christian-charity-funding-hate-groups-1370055

19th News. (2024, July). Project 2025: Women, education, LGBTQ+, workforce. https://19thnews.org/2024/07/project-2025-women-education-lgbtq-workforce/

NOTUS. (2024, November 21). Trump-aligned groups get big boost from dark money DonorsTrust. https://www.notus.org/money/trump-donors-trust-america-first-policy-institute-legal-foundation-donations

NPR. (2004, November 3). Eleven states vote to ban same-sex marriage. https://www.npr.org/2004/11/03/4141481/eleven-states-vote-to-ban-same-sex-marriage

NPR. (2008, October 31). Mormons divided on same-sex marriage issue. https://www.npr.org/2008/10/31/96405866/mormons-divided-on-same-sex-marriage-issue

OpenDemocracy. (2021, July 5). DAFs: How ‘donor-advised funds’ let anonymous US givers bankroll anti-LGBTQ groups. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/donor-advised-funds-daf-us-charity-law-loophole-bankroll-hate/

Palm Center. (2012). One year out: An assessment of DADT repeal’s impact on military readiness. https://www.palmcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/One-Year-Out_0.pdf

PBS NewsHour. (n.d.). Out of the past: 1977. https://www.pbs.org/outofthepast/past/p5/1977.html

PBS NewsHour. (2025, November 6). Supreme Court lets Trump block transgender Americans from choosing passport sex markers. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-lets-trump-block-transgender-americans-from-choosing-passport-sex-markers

PBS NewsHour. (2025, December 24). Tracking how much of Project 2025 the Trump administration achieved this year. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/tracking-how-much-of-project-2025-the-trump-administration-achieved-this-year

Political Research Associates. (1993, March 19). Constructing homophobia. https://politicalresearch.org/1993/03/19/constructing-homophobia

Political Research Associates. (2013, April 5). Profiles on the right: Restored Hope Network. https://politicalresearch.org/2013/04/05/profiles-right-restored-hope-network

Political Research Associates. (2018, June 22). Profile on the right: The Heritage Foundation. https://politicalresearch.org/2018/06/22/profile-right-heritage-foundation

Political Research Associates. (2020, July 14). A room of their own: How WoLF became a tool of the right. https://politicalresearch.org/2020/07/14/room-their-own

ProPublica. (n.d.). Do No Harm [Form 990, EIN 874701865]. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/874701865

ProPublica. (n.d.). Institute for Comprehensive Gender Dysphoria Research [Form 990, EIN 852892486]. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/852892486

ProPublica. (n.d.). Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine Corp [Form 990, EIN 844520593]. ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/844520593

ProPublica. (n.d.). Nonprofit Explorer [database]. https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/

Psychiatric News. (2019, October). Courageous actions led to removal of homosexuality as a diagnosis in DSM. https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.pn.2019.10b11

Psychology Today. (2017, May 8). The American College of Pediatricians is an anti-LGBT group. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/political-minds/201705/the-american-college-of-pediatricians-is-an-anti-lgbt-group

Public Seminar. (2024, August 24). Project Christian radicalism. https://publicseminar.substack.com/p/project-christian-radicalism

Recovered Memory Archive. (n.d.). Paul McHugh. https://www.recoveredmemory.org/proponents-of-rm-1/paul-mchugh

Reed, E. [Erin in the Morning]. (2024, July 29). Chloe Cole testifies she makes up to $200,000 opposing trans care. https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/chloe-cole-testifies-she-makes-up

Reed, E. [Erin in the Morning]. (2026, March 24). The same dark money behind Project 2025 is bankrolling a Northwestern study recruiting trans kids. https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/the-same-dark-money-behind-project

Reed, E. [Erin in the Morning]. (2026, April 22). Trump’s HHS report co-author is headlining a trans youth care panel. https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/trumps-hhs-report-co-author-is-headlining

Religion Dispatches. (2010, February 2). When Mormons mobilize: Anti-gay marriage Prop. 8 effort ‘outed.’ https://religiondispatches.org/2010/02/02/when-mormons-mobilize-anti-gay-marriage-prop-8-effort-outed

Restored Hope Network. (n.d.). Donations. https://www.restoredhopenetwork.org/donation

Robles, R., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., & Reed, G. M. (2022). How gender dysphoria and incongruence became medical diagnoses — a historical review. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 76(Suppl. 1), S5–S12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9286744/

Rolling Stone. (2023, October 29). Mike Johnson’s Alliance Defending Freedom pushed anti-LGBTQ legislation. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/mike-johnson-alliance-defending-freedom-anti-lgbtq-1234865340/

Salon. (2021, June 3). Millions in Christian-right dark money funding counterattack on LGBTQ+ equality. https://www.salon.com/2021/06/03/millions-in-christian-right-dark-money-funding-counterattack-on-lgbtq-equality/

Salon. (2023, December 10). The ‘dark money ATM of the right’ is funneling money to hate groups while hiding donor identities. https://www.salon.com/2023/12/10/the-dark-money-atm-of-the-right-is-funneling-money-to-hate-groups-while-hiding-donor-identities/

Slate. (2023, May 2). Trans kids: What gender-exploratory therapy is really about. https://slate.com/technology/2023/05/gender-exploratory-therapy-trans-kids-what-is-it.html

Slate. (2024, July 22). Anti-trans bathroom bills: Why the once dead legislation is making a major comeback. https://slate.com/life/2024/07/bathroom-bills-anti-trans-legislation-comeback.html

Sludge. (2019, March 19). America’s biggest Christian charity funnels tens of millions to hate groups. https://readsludge.com/2019/03/19/americas-biggest-christian-charity-funnels-tens-of-millions-to-hate-groups/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). Alliance Defending Freedom [extremist file]. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/alliance-defending-freedom/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). American College of Pediatricians [extremist file]. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/american-college-pediatricians/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). American Family Association [extremist file]. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/american-family-association/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). Family Research Council [extremist file]. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/family-research-council/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). Focus on the Family [extremist file]. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/focus-family/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). Foundations of contemporary anti-LGBTQ+ pseudoscience. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/foundations/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). History of the anti-gay movement since 1977. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/history-anti-gay-movement-1977/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). QUACKS: ‘Conversion therapists,’ the anti-LGBT right, and the demonization of homosexuality. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/quacks-conversion-therapists-anti-lgbt-right-and-demonization-homosexuality/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (n.d.). Tony Perkins [extremist file]. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/tony-perkins/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2010, December 20). DADT comments by FRC’s Perkins echo old racist fears. https://www.splcenter.org/news/2010/12/20/dadt-comments-frc-perkins-echo-old-racist-fears

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2015, May 17). NARTH Institute affiliate addresses anti-LGBT audience in Dublin. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2015/05/17/narth-institute-affiliate-addresses-anti-lgbt-audience-dublin

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2018, March 30). Rise and fall of the Traditional Values Coalition. https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/03/30/rise-and-fall-traditional-values-coalition

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2020). Louis Sheldon, founder of anti-LGBTQ Traditional Values Coalition, dead at 85. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/louis-sheldon-founder-anti-lgbtq-traditional-values-coalition-dead-85/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2023). Defining the pseudoscience network. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/reports/defining-pseudoscience-network/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2024, December 3). Documents reveal ADF requested anti-trans research from American College of Pediatricians. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/documents-reveal-adf-requested-anti-trans-research-american-college-pediatricians/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2026). Hard-right exploitation of detransition narratives flourishes at event, online. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/detransition-narratives/

Southern Poverty Law Center. (2026, April). Unwanted: The resurgent hateful language of ‘conversion therapy.’ https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/unwanted-lawsuit-resurgent-hateful-language-conversion-therapy/

SourceWatch. (n.d.). Benjamin Rush Institute. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Benjamin_Rush_Institute

SourceWatch. (n.d.). Council for National Policy. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Council_for_National_Policy

SourceWatch. (n.d.). Ethics and Public Policy Center. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Ethics_and_Public_Policy_Center

SourceWatch. (n.d.). Heritage Foundation. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Heritage_Foundation

SourceWatch. (n.d.). Women’s Liberation Front. https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Women’s_Liberation_Front

STAT News. (2022, October 3). ‘History is repeating itself’: The story of the nation’s first clinic for gender-affirming surgery. https://www.statnews.com/2022/10/03/gender-affirming-surgery-hospitals-johns-hopkins/

Supreme Transparency. (n.d.). Ethics and Public Policy Center. https://supremetransparency.org/powerbrokers/ethics-and-public-policy-center/

Task & Purpose. (2025, March 3). Transgender troops say the military will lose key skills under ban. https://taskandpurpose.com/military-life/transgender-troops-forced-separation/

The Advocate. (2015, December 15). The scary science at Johns Hopkins University. https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2015/12/15/scary-science-johns-hopkins-university

The Advocate. (2016, January 26). Don’t ask, don’t tell: A compromise that didn’t work. https://www.advocate.com/history/dont-ask-dont-tell-history

The Advocate. (2016, August 29). New ‘scientific’ study on sexuality, gender is neither new nor scientific. https://www.advocate.com/commentary/2016/8/29/new-scientific-study-sexuality-gender-neither-new-nor-scientific

The Advocate. (2020, May 30). Lou Sheldon dies; led anti-LGBTQ+ Traditional Values Coalition. https://www.advocate.com/news/2020/5/30/lou-sheldon-dies-led-anti-lgbtq-traditional-values-coalition

The Advocate. (2024, August 13). Powerful conservative operative’s Do No Harm group is a threat to transgender kids. https://www.advocate.com/politics/leonard-leo-danger-transgender-kids

The Hill. (2025, January 21). Trump revokes Biden-era order allowing transgender members to serve in military. https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5096977-trump-revokes-biden-era-order-allowing-transgender-members-to-serve-in-military/

TIME. (2018, November 30). How ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ continues to impact the military. https://time.com/5339634/dont-ask-dont-tell-25-year-anniversary/

TIME. (2021, April 9). In Arkansas, trans youth face the country’s strictest laws yet. https://time.com/5953363/trans-youth-arkansas/

TIME. (2025, June 18). Supreme Court upholds gender-affirming-care ban. https://time.com/7295695/supreme-court-skrmetti-transgender-healthcare-minors/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Chloe Cole. https://transdatalibrary.org/person/chloe-cole/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Gender Exploratory Therapy Association. https://transdatalibrary.org/organization/gender-exploratory-therapy-association/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Genspect. https://transdatalibrary.org/organization/genspect/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Institute for Comprehensive Gender Dysphoria Research. https://transdatalibrary.org/organization/institute-for-comprehensive-gender-dysphoria-research/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Lisa Littman. https://transdatalibrary.org/person/lisa-littman/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Rapid onset gender dysphoria. https://transdatalibrary.org/concept/rapid-onset-gender-dysphoria/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine. https://transdatalibrary.org/organization/society-for-evidence-based-gender-medicine/

Trans Data Library. (n.d.). Women’s Liberation Front. https://transdatalibrary.org/organization/womens-liberation-front/

Trans Legislation Tracker. (2025). 2025 anti-trans bills tracker. https://translegislation.com/

Trans Safety Network. (2021, August 26). SEGM uncovered: Large anonymous payments funding dodgy science. https://transsafety.network/posts/segm-uncovered/

TransAdvocate. (2018, June 26). Johns Hopkins resumes trans care. https://www.transadvocate.com/johns-hopkins-resumes-trans-care_n_19077.htm

Transgender Map. (n.d.). Gender Exploratory Therapy Association vs. transgender people. https://www.transgendermap.com/issues/academia/gender-critical/gender-exploratory-therapy-association/

Transgender Map. (n.d.). Paul McHugh vs. transgender people. https://www.transgendermap.com/issues/psychiatry/paul-mchugh/

Transgender Map. (n.d.). The Kelsey Coalition vs. transgender people. https://www.transgendermap.com/issues/groups/kelsey-coalition/

Transgender Map. (n.d.). Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF) vs. transgender people. https://www.transgendermap.com/issues/academia/gender-critical/womens-liberation-front/

Transgender Map. (2025). 2025 US HHS report attacking gender-affirming care. https://www.transgendermap.com/issues/medicine/pediatrics/2025-hhs-report/

Trevor Project. (2025, June 18). Supreme Court greenlights healthcare discrimination for transgender youth in U.S. v. Skrmetti. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/blog/supreme-court-greenlights-healthcare-discrimination-for-transgender-youth-in-u-s-v-skrmetti/

Uncloseted Media. (2026, March 20). In the hidden world of donor-advised funds, anti-LGBTQ groups make big money. https://www.unclosetedmedia.com/p/in-the-hidden-world-of-donor-advised

Undark. (2024, May 20). Pediatric transgender care and the contentious rise of SEGM. https://undark.org/2024/05/20/pediatric-transgender-care-contentious-segm/

United States Supreme Court. (2025). United States v. Skrmetti, 605 U.S. ___ (No. 23-477). https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf

University of Wyoming, American Heritage Center. (n.d.). Paul M. Weyrich papers, 1968–2002 [finding aid]. Archives West. https://archiveswest.orbiscascade.org/ark:80444/xv971551

UPI/CMU archive. (1993, January 29). Nunn criticized for opposing end to gay military ban. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/usr/scotts/ftp/bulgarians/nunn-ban.html

Washington Blade. (2021, October 18). ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ clouds Powell’s legacy. https://www.washingtonblade.com/2021/10/18/dont-ask-dont-tell-clouds-powells-legacy/

Washington Examiner. (2024, November 19). Conservative ‘dark money ATM’ DonorsTrust records $351 million disbursements. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/investigations/3234126/conservative-dark-money-atm-donorstrust-record-351-million/

Washington Post. (2016, June 30). The Pentagon’s ban on transgender service just fell — but the details are complicated. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2016/06/30/the-pentagons-ban-on-transgender-service-just-fell-but-the-details-are-complicated/

Wisconsin Watch. (2024, July). Project 2025: What is the Heritage Foundation’s vision for a second Trump term? https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/07/project-2025-trump-heritage-foundation-gender-abortion-lqbtq-republican/

World Health Organization. (n.d.). Gender incongruence and transgender health in the ICD [FAQ]. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/frequently-asked-questions/gender-incongruence-and-transgender-health-in-the-icd

World Health Organization. (1992). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (10th rev.). WHO.

World Health Organization. (2019). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th rev.). WHO. https://icd.who.int

World Professional Association for Transgender Health. (2010). Consensus statement on considerations of the role of distress (criterion D) in the DSM diagnosis of gender identity disorder. International Journal of Transgenderism, 12(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2010.513927

World Religions & Spirituality Project. (2022, April 11). Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity (ATCSI/NARTH). https://wrldrels.org/2022/04/11/20291/

Xtra Magazine. (2023). Detransition, the TERF movement, and Elisa Shupe. https://xtramagazine.com/power/detransition-terf-movement-elisa-shupe-247592

APA → American Psychiatric Association

DSM → Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (with edition noted)

NARTH → National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality

SPLC → Southern Poverty Law Center

ALEC → American Legislative Exchange Council

HRC → Human Rights Campaign

EPPC → Ethics and Public Policy Center

ADF → Alliance Defending Freedom

AFA → American Family Association

FRC → Family Research Council

TVC → Traditional Values Coalition

CNP → Council for National Policy

ACLJ → American Center for Law and Justice

GLAAD → Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation

CMR → Center for Military Readiness

DADT → Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

NCLR → National Center for Lesbian Rights

WHO → World Health Organization

ICD → International Classification of Diseases (with edition)

WPATH → World Professional Association for Transgender Health

GID → gender identity disorder

GIDC → gender identity disorder of childhood

USCCB → United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

ACA → Affordable Care Act

VAWA → Violence Against Women Act

ERDs → Ethical and Religious Directives

DOMA → Defense of Marriage Act

FMA → Federal Marriage Amendment

LDS → Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

JCS → Joint Chiefs of Staff

FAIR → Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting

CSP → Center for Security Policy

RHN → Restored Hope Network

NCF → National Christian Foundation

DAF → donor-advised fund

IRS → Internal Revenue Service

SEGM → Society for Evidence-Based Gender Medicine

ROGD → rapid onset gender dysphoria

ACPeds → American College of Pediatricians

AAP → American Academy of Pediatrics

NIH → National Institutes of Health

HUD → Department of Housing and Urban Development

HATAC → Hands Across the Aisle Coalition

FPA → Family Policy Alliance

SOCE → sexual orientation change efforts

ATCSI → Alliance for Therapeutic Choice and Scientific Integrity

GETA → Gender Exploratory Therapy Association

GET → gender exploratory therapy

RIME → Rethink Identity Medicine Ethics

ICGDR → Institute for Comprehensive Gender Dysphoria Research

HB1570 → House Bill 1570

EO → Executive Order (with number)

SPPA → Student Physical Privacy Act

HB2 → House Bill 2

HB1557 → House Bill 1557

SB1 → Senate Bill 1

ACLU → American Civil Liberties Union

KFF → Kaiser Family Foundation

AG → Attorney General

FDA → Food and Drug Administration

ERA → Equal Rights Amendment

LAUSD → Los Angeles Unified School District

WoLF → Women’s Liberation Front (expanded and then abbreviated)

Transgender History Source Document (LINK)



Statement on Research Methodology & Ethical Use of AI

I created this page as a researcher using AI technology, drawing on my training and background in research, counseling, and psychology, as well as a broader interdisciplinary foundation across diverse subjects. You can view my training certificates via the link on the Bio Page. This work was also supported by AI tools, which assisted with research synthesis, identifying key figures and themes, and providing editing support.

I also recognize that AI technology depends on significant human and environmental resources, including the energy required to power large-scale data systems. As I integrate these tools into my work, I remain responsible for continuously evaluating their ethical integrity—especially in relation to algorithmic bias, community safety, and environmental impact.

I have been intentionally learning how to use AI over the past year to better support the communities I serve.

This is a living, collaborative project—please feel free to use the information here in any classroom or educational space that affirms LGBTQ people.

Downloadable Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17UbtQtLFoW9RHqMWuj9WCOYNvimiFDYvj7VEzglycV4/edit?usp=sharing

Constitutional Foundations

As a transgender counselor publishing public-facing research and historical education during this time in history, the First, Fourteenth, and Fifth Amendments matter directly to my work. The First protects my right to speak, write, and share evidence-based information in the public sphere; the Fourteenth anchors equal protection and due process when discriminatory laws target transgender people and healthcare; and the Fifth reinforces due process protections in investigations, discipline, or licensing actions. The Eighth Amendment also matters in contexts where cruel or harmful conditions—including denial of medically necessary care—are at issue, and the Ninth reflects that fundamental rights are not limited to what is explicitly listed in the Constitution. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/

If you believe any factual statement is inaccurate, email saren@resonanceportland.com with the specific sentence and source; I will correct errors promptly.